首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Climate >A comparative study of precipitation and evaporation between CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate model ensembles in semiarid regions.
【24h】

A comparative study of precipitation and evaporation between CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate model ensembles in semiarid regions.

机译:半干旱地区CMIP3和CMIP5气候模式集合之间的降水和蒸发比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The twentieth-century climatology and twenty-first-century trend in precipitation P, evaporation E, and P-E for selected semiarid U.S. Southwest and Mediterranean regions are compared between ensembles from phases 3 and 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3 and CMIP5). The twentieth-century simulations are validated with precipitation from observation and evaporation from reanalysis. It is found that the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A1B simulations in CMIP3 and the simulations with representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5 in CMIP5 produce qualitatively similar seasonal cycles of the twenty-first-century trend in P-E for both semiarid regions. For the southwestern United States, it is characterized by a strong drying trend in spring, a weak moistening trend in summer, a weak drying trend in winter, and an overall drying trend for the annual mean. For the Mediterranean region, a drying trend is simulated for all seasons with an October maximum and July minimum. The consistency between CMIP3 and CMIP5 scenarios indicates that the simulated trend is robust; however, while the trend in P-E is negative in spring for the southwestern United States for all CMIP ensembles, CMIP3 predicts a strongly negative trend in P and minor negative trend in E whereas both CMIP5 scenarios predict a nearly zero trend in P and positive trend in E. For the twentieth-century simulations, the P, E, and P-E of the two model ensembles are statistically indistinguishable for most seasons. This "stagnation" of the simulated climatology from CMIP3 to CMIP5 implies that the hydroclimatic variable biases have not decreased in the newer generation of models. Notably, over the southwestern United States the CMIP3 models produce too much precipitation in the cold season. This bias remains almost unchanged in CMIP5.
机译:在耦合模型比较项目(CMIP3和CMIP5)的第3阶段和第5阶段的集合中,比较了美国西南部和地中海半干旱地区特定降水的20世纪气候和21世纪趋势P,蒸发E和P-E。二十世纪的模拟通过观测中的降水和再分析中的蒸发进行了验证。发现CMIP3中的排放情景特别报告(SRES)A1B模拟以及CMIP5中具有代表性浓度路径(RCP)4.5和8.5的模拟在两种半干旱地区的PE产生了21世纪趋势的定性相似的季节性周期地区。在美国西南部,其特征在于春季的干燥趋势强烈,夏季的湿润趋势弱,冬季的干燥趋势弱以及年平均总体干燥趋势。对于地中海地区,模拟了所有季节的干燥趋势,最高月份为十月,最低月份为七月。 CMIP3和CMIP5方案之间的一致性表明,模拟趋势是稳健的。但是,尽管美国西南部的春季所有CMIP乐团的PE趋势均为负,但CMIP3预测P的趋势为负极强,E呈较小的负趋势,而CMIP5情景均预测P几乎为零,而CIP5趋势为正。 E.在20世纪的模拟中,两个模型集合的P,E和PE在大多数季节在统计上是无法区分的。从CMIP3到CMIP5的模拟气候的这种“停滞”意味着,在新一代模型中,水文气候变量偏差并未降低。值得注意的是,在美国西南部,CMIP3模型在寒冷季节产生过多的降水。在CMIP5中,这种偏差几乎保持不变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号