...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical infectious diseases >A randomized trial comparing plasma drug concentrations and efficacies between 2 nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens in HIV-infected patients receiving rifampicin: the N2R Study.
【24h】

A randomized trial comparing plasma drug concentrations and efficacies between 2 nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens in HIV-infected patients receiving rifampicin: the N2R Study.

机译:N2R研究比较了2种基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的方案在接受利福平治疗的HIV感染患者中的血浆药物浓度和疗效的随机试验:N2R研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, to date, no prospective, randomized, clinical trial has compared standard doses of efavirenz- and nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy among patients with concurrent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection and tuberculosis (TB) who are receiving rifampicin. METHODS: Rifampicin recipients with concurrent HIV-1 infection and TB were randomized to receive antiretroviral therapy that included either efavirenz (600 mg per day) or nevirapine (400 mg per day). Efavirenz and nevirapine concentrations at 12 h after dosing (C12) were monitored at weeks 6 and 12. CD4+ cell counts and HIV-1 RNA levels were assessed every 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients were randomized into 2 groups equally. The mean body weight of patients was 53 kg, the mean CD4+ cell count was 65 cells/mm3, and the median HIV-1 RNA level was 5.8 log10 copies/mL. At weeks 6 and 12, the mean C12 of efavirenz (+/- standard deviation) were 4.27+/-4.49 and 3.54+/-3.78 mg/L, respectively, and those for nevirapine were 5.59+/-3.48 and 5.6+/-2.65 mg/L, respectively. Interpatient variability in the efavirenz group was 2.3-fold greater than that in the nevirapine group (coefficient of variation, 107% vs. 47%). At week 12, 3.1% of patients in the efavirenz group and 21.3% in the nevirapine group had C12 values that were less than the recommended minimum concentrations (odds ratio, 8.396; 95% confidence interval, 1.808-38.993; P= .002). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 73.2% and 71.8% of patients in the efavirenz and nevirapine groups, respectively, achieved HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL at week 48, with respective mean CD4+ cell counts of 274 and 252 cells/mm3 (P> .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with low C12 values and those with a body weight <55 kg were 3.6 and 2.4 times more likely, respectively, to develop all-cause treatment failure (P< .05). CONCLUSIONS: Antiretroviral therapy regimens containing efavirenz (600 mg per day) were less compromised by concomitant use of rifampicin than were those that contained nevirapine (400 mg per day) in patients with concurrent HIV-1 infection and TB. Low drug exposure and low body weight are important predictive factors for treatment failure.
机译:背景:据我们所知,迄今为止,尚无一项前瞻性,随机,临床试验在患有并发人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)和结核病(TB)的患者中比较基于依非韦伦和奈韦拉平的抗逆转录病毒疗法的标准剂量正在接受利福平。方法:将并发HIV-1感染和结核病的利福平接受者随机接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,包括依非韦伦(每天600毫克)或奈韦拉平(每天400毫克)。在给药后第12周和第12周监测给药后12小时(C12)的依夫韦仑和奈韦拉平浓度。每12周评估一次CD4 +细胞计数和HIV-1 RNA水平。结果:142例患者被随机分为两组。患者的平均体重为53 kg,平均CD4 +细胞数为65细胞/ mm3,中位数HIV-1 RNA水平为5.8 log10拷贝/ mL。在第6周和第12周,依非韦伦的平均C12(+/-标准偏差)分别为4.27 +/- 4.49和3.54 +/- 3.78 mg / L,而奈韦拉平的C12平均值为5.59 +/- 3.48和5.6 + /分别为-2.65 mg / L。依非韦伦组的患者间变异性比奈韦拉平组大2.3倍(变异系数分别为107%和47%)。在第12周时,依非韦伦组3.1%的患者和奈韦拉平组21.3%的C12值均低于建议的最低浓度(几率为8.396; 95%置信区间为1.808-38.993; P = .002) 。意向性治疗分析显示,依非韦伦和奈韦拉平组分别有73.2%和71.8%的患者在第48周达到HIV-1 RNA水平<50拷贝/ mL,CD4 +平均细胞数分别为274和252细胞/ mm3(P> .05)。多因素分析显示,C12值低的患者和体重<55 kg的患者发生全因治疗失败的可能性分别为3.6和2.4倍(P <.05)。结论:对于同时感染HIV-1和结核病的患者,使用依非韦伦(每天600 mg)的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案与同时使用利福平相比,对利福平的损害较小。低药物暴露和低体重是治疗失败的重要预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号