...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Assessment of Model Chemistries for Noncovalent Interactions
【24h】

Assessment of Model Chemistries for Noncovalent Interactions

机译:非共价相互作用的模型化学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present study,we report tests of 57 model chemistry methods for calculating binding energies of 31 diverse van der Waals molecules arranged in five databases of noncovalent interaction energies.The model chemistries studied include wave function theory (WFT),density functional theory (DFT),and combined wave function-density-functional-theory (CWFDFT),and they include methods whose computational effort scales (for large systems) as N~7,N~6,N~6,and N~4,where N is the number of atoms.The model chemistries include 2 CWFDFT A/7 models,4 multilevel WFT N~7 models,5 single-level WFT A/7 models,4 CWFDFT N~6 models,3 multilevel WFT N~6 models,11 single-level WFT N~6 models,5 CWFDFT N~6 models,10 single-level WFTN~6 models,4 multilevel WFT N~6 models,4 single-level DFT N~4 models,and 5 single-level WFT N~4 models.We draw the following conclusions based on the mean absolute errors in 31 noncovalent binding energies:(1) MCG3-MPW gives the best performance for predicting the binding energies of these noncovalent complexes.(2) MCQCISD-MPWB and MCQCISD-MPW are the best two N~6 methods.(3) M05-2X is the best single-level method for these noncovalent complexes.These four methods should facilitate useful calculations on a wide variety of practical applications involving hydrogen bonding,charge-transfer complexes,dipole interactions,weak (dispersion-like) interactions,and pi...pi stacking.If a user is interested in only a particular type of noncovalent interactions,though,some other methods,may be recommended for especially favorable performance/cost ratios.For example,BMC-CCSD has an outstanding performance for hydrogen bonding,and PWB6K has an outstanding cost-adjusted performance for dipole interaction calculations on very large systems.We also show that M05-2X performs well for interactions of amino acid pair residues.
机译:在本研究中,我们报告了57种模型化学方法的测试,这些方法用于计算排列在五个非共价相互作用能数据库中的31种不同范德华分子的结合能。研究的模型化学包括波函数理论(WFT),密度泛函理论(DFT) ),以及组合的波函数密度函数理论(CWFDFT),它们包括计算工作量规模(对于大型系统)为N〜7,N〜6,N〜6和N〜4的方法,其中N为模型化学包括2个CWFDFT A / 7模型,4个多级WFT N〜7模型,5个单级WFT A / 7模型,4个CWFDFT N〜6模型,3个多级WFT N〜6模型,11单级WFT N〜6模型,5个CWFDFT N〜6模型,10个单级WFTN〜6模型,4个多级WFT N〜6模型,4个单级DFT N〜4模型和5个单级WFT N 〜4个模型。我们基于31种非共价结合能的平均绝对误差得出以下结论:(1)MCG3-MPW在预测结合能方面表现出最佳性能这些非共价复合物。(2)MCQCISD-MPWB和MCQCISD-MPW是最好的两种N〜6方法。(3)M05-2X是这些非共价复合物的最佳单级方法。这四种方法应有助于对广泛的实际应用涉及氢键,电荷转移络合物,偶极子相互作用,弱(类分散体)相互作用和pi ... pi堆积。如果用户仅对特定类型的非共价相互作用感兴趣,还可以建议使用其他一些方法来获得特别有利的性能/成本比。例如,BMC-CCSD具有出色的氢键性能,而PWB6K具有出色的成本调整性能,可用于超大型系统的偶极子相互作用计算。 M05-2X在氨基酸对残基的相互作用中表现良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号