...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical infectious diseases >Clinical laboratory practices for the isolation and identification of campylobacter in foodborne diseases active surveillance network (foodnet) sites: Baseline information for understanding changes in surveillance data
【24h】

Clinical laboratory practices for the isolation and identification of campylobacter in foodborne diseases active surveillance network (foodnet) sites: Baseline information for understanding changes in surveillance data

机译:在食源性疾病主动监测网络(foodnet)站点中分离和鉴定弯曲杆菌的临床实验室实践:用于了解监测数据变化的基准信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background.Campylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States. Understanding laboratory practices is essential to interpreting incidence and trends in reported campylobacteriosis over time and provides a baseline for evaluating the increasing use of culture-independent diagnostic methods for Campylobacter infection.Methods.The Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) conducts surveillance for laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter infections. In 2005, FoodNet conducted a survey of clinical laboratories to describe routine practices used for isolation and identification of Campylobacter. A profile was assigned to laboratories based on complete responses to key survey questions that could impact the recovery and isolation of Campylobacter from stool specimens.Results.Of 411 laboratories testing on-site for Campylobacter, 97% used only culture methods. Among those responding to the individual questions, nearly all used transport medium (97%) and incubated at 42°C (94%); however, most deviated from existing guidelines in other areas: 68% held specimens in transport medium at room temperature before plating, 51% used Campy blood agar plate medium, 52% read plates at <72 hours of incubation, and 14% batched plates before placing them in a microaerobic environment. In all, there were 106 testing algorithms among 214 laboratories with a complete profile; only 16 laboratories were fully adherent to existing guidelines.Conclusions.Although most laboratories used culture-based methods, procedures differed widely and most did not adhere to existing guidelines, likely resulting in underdiagnosis. Given the availability of new culture-independent testing methods, these data highlight a clear need to develop best practice recommendations for Campylobacter infection diagnostic testing.
机译:背景:弯曲杆菌是美国食源性疾病的主要原因。了解实验室实践对于解释一段时间内报告的弯曲杆菌病的发生率和趋势至关重要,并为评估越来越多使用与培养无关的弯曲杆菌感染诊断方法提供了基线。确认弯曲杆菌感染。 2005年,FoodNet对临床实验室进行了一项调查,以描述用于分离和鉴定弯曲杆菌的常规方法。根据对可能影响粪便标本中弯曲杆菌的回收和分离的关键调查问题的完整回答,为实验室分配了一个档案。结果。在现场测试弯曲杆菌的411个实验室中,有97%仅使用培养方法。在回答单个问题的人员中,几乎所有使用的运输培养基(97%)均在42°C(94%)的温度下孵育。但是,大多数偏离其他领域的现有准则:68%的标本在铺板前在室温下保存在运输培养基中; 51%的样品使用Campy血琼脂平板培养液; 52%的孵育时间小于72小时的读板; 14%的分批培养板在培养前将它们放置在有氧环境中。总共214个实验室中有106个测试算法,它们具有完整的概况;结论:尽管大多数实验室使用的是基于培养的方法,但操作规程差异很大,而且大多数实验室均未遵循现有指南,因此可能导致诊断不足。考虑到新的与文化无关的测试方法的可用性,这些数据突出表明了明确需要针对弯曲杆菌感染诊断测试制定最佳实践建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号