首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Marked suppression of pulmonary vein firing after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Is pulmonary vein firing an epiphenomenon?
【24h】

Marked suppression of pulmonary vein firing after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Is pulmonary vein firing an epiphenomenon?

机译:阵发性心房颤动患者外周肺静脉隔离后肺静脉烧伤的明显抑制:肺静脉烧伤是一种现象吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is Pulmonary Vein Firing an Epiphenomenon? Introduction Rapid firing in pulmonary veins (PVs) is a leading cause of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We hypothesized that PV firing (PV-F) should continue after circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) because the PV tissue responsible for PV-F remains intact. Methods and Results In Group-1 (n = 92), isoproterenol (ISP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were co-administered to provoke PV-F before and after CPVI. The site of rapid focal discharge that initiated atrial fibrillation (AF) defined PV-F versus non-PV-F. Additional 17 patients with PV-F induced by ISP+ATP before CPVI were enrolled into Group-2 and various pacing maneuvers were used in conjunction to ISP+ATP to provoke PV-F after CPVI. In Group-1, AF was induced in 47/81 (58.0%) and 16/88 (18.2%) patients before and after CPVI, respectively (P < 0.01). Before CPVI, 43/47 (91.5%) of the rapid firing originated from PV. After successful CPVI, 88/92 patients were in sinus rhythm and non-PV-F was induced in 14/88 patients. PV-F was induced in 2/88 patients, which was eliminated by ganglionated plexus ablation outside the CPVI line. In Group-2, various pacing maneuvers with ISP+ATP only induced PV-F in 1/17 patients after CPVI. Conclusion Marked suppression of PV-F after CPVI strongly suggests that the real source of PV-F is located in the atrium. PV-F may be an epiphenomenon.
机译:肺静脉是否产生表象现象?简介肺静脉快速射击(PVs)是阵发性房颤的主要原因。我们假设在进行周向PV隔离(CPVI)后应继续进行PV发射(PV-F),因为负责PV-F的PV组织保持完整。方法和结果在第1组(n = 92)中,CPVI前后联合使用异丙肾上腺素(ISP)和三磷酸腺苷(ATP)诱发PV-F。引发房颤的快速局灶性放电部位定义为PV-F与非PV-F。在CPVI之前将另外17例由ISP + ATP诱发的PV-F患者纳入第2组,并使用各种起搏手法与ISP + ATP一起在CPVI后诱发PV-F。在第1组中,分别在CPVI之前和之后在47/81(58.0%)和16/88(18.2%)的患者中诱发了房颤(P <0.01)。在CPVI之前,有43/47(91.5%)的快速射击来自PV。成功实施CPVI后,有88/92例患者出现窦性心律,在14/88例患者中诱发了非PV-F。在2/88名患者中诱发了PV-F,其被CPVI线外的神经节神经丛消融所消除。在第2组中,ISP + ATP的各种起搏动作仅在CPVI后的1/17例患者中诱发PV-F。结论CPVI后对PV-F的明显抑制强烈表明PV-F的真正来源位于心房。 PV-F可能是一种现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号