首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Efficacy of Repeat Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedures in Patients with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation.
【24h】

Efficacy of Repeat Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedures in Patients with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation.

机译:重复性肺静脉隔离术对复发性房颤患者的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Efficacy of Repeat Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Introduction: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is effective in the treatment of most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Some advocate the addition of linear ablation techniques to improve efficacy; however, previous studies suggest recurrent PV conduction is responsible for AF recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of repeat PV isolation in patients with recurrent AF after an initial ablation procedure and to determine if any patient characteristics predict failure of repeat PV isolation procedures. Methods and Results: Seventy-four patients with two or more AF ablation procedures using selective PV isolation were included. PV isolation was guided with multielectrode ring catheter recordings, electroanatomic mapping, and intracardiac electrocardiography. Radiofrequency energy was delivered using a 4-mm-tip catheter (maximum 40 W, 52 degrees C); cooled-tip ablation was performed in 10 patients. Linear ablation was not performed. Antiarrhythmic drugs were continued for at least 6 weeks after ablation; AF episodes during this period were censored. Reconnection of one or more segments of previously ablated PVs was observed in 97% of patients; reconnected PVs served as the trigger for AF in 77%. Repeat PV isolation resulted in AF control (cure or 90% reduction in AF episodes) in 64 patients (86%) over a follow-up period of 9.1 +/- 6.7 months. "High-risk" characteristics such as left atrial enlargement, persistent AF, or mitral regurgitation did not predict failure of repeat PV isolation procedures. Conclusion: Recurrent AF following selective PV isolation is overwhelmingly associated with PV electrical reconnection. Repeat PV isolation without linear ablation provides effective treatment for recurrent AF in patients in whom an initial PV isolation procedure failed, independent of clinical characteristics. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 1-6, September 2004)
机译:重复肺静脉隔离的功效。简介:肺静脉(PV)隔离可有效治疗大多数房颤(AF)患者。一些人主张增加线性消融技术以提高疗效。但是,以前的研究表明,PV复发是房颤复发的原因。这项研究的目的是确定在初始消融手术后进行反复房颤患者进行反复PV隔离的有效性,并确定是否有任何患者特征预示了重复PV隔离手术的失败。方法和结果:包括74例采用选择性PV隔离进行两次或更多次AF消融手术的患者。 PV隔离通过多电极环形导管记录,电解剖标测和心内心电图指导。使用4毫米尖端的导管(最大40 W,52摄氏度)输送射频能量。 10例患者进行了冷尖端消融。没有进行线性消融。消融后抗心律失常药物至少持续6周。在此期间对房颤发作进行了检查。 97%的患者观察到先前消融的PV的一个或多个节段重新连接;重新连接的PV触发了AF的发生率为77%。在9.1 +/- 6.7个月的随访期间,重复进行PV隔离导致64例患者(86%)发生了房颤控制(治愈或房颤发作减少90%)。左房增大,持续性房颤或二尖瓣反流等“高危”特征不能预示重复PV隔离手术的失败。结论:选择性PV隔离后的复发性AF与PV电气重新连接绝大多数相关。重复PV隔离而不进行线性消融可为初始PV隔离程序失败的患者提供复发性AF的有效治疗,而与临床特征无关。 (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,第15卷,第1-6页,2004年9月)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号