...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology >Safety and Efficacy from an 8 Week Double-Blind Trial and a 26 Week Open-Label Extension of Asenapine in Adolescents with Schizophrenia
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy from an 8 Week Double-Blind Trial and a 26 Week Open-Label Extension of Asenapine in Adolescents with Schizophrenia

机译:在患有精神分裂症的青少年中进行8周双盲试验和26周阿塞那平开放标签延长试验的安全性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of asenapine in adolescents with schizophrenia. Methods: In an 8 week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, subjects (12-17 years of age) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, asenapine 2.5mg b.i.d., or asenapine 5mg b.i.d. Subjects who completed the 8 week acute study could participate in a 26 week flexible-dose asenapine-only open-label extension (OLE). Results: A similar percentage of subjects completed treatment on day 56 (2.5mg b.i.d. (n=98): 83%; 5mg b.i.d. [n=106]: 79%; placebo [n=102]: 79%). In the mixed model for repeated measures analysis of the primary end-point (with Hochberg correction for multiplicity), least squares (LS) mean differences between asenapine and placebo on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at day 56 were not significant (-4.8 for 2.5mg b.i.d., p=0.070; -5.6 for 5mg b.i.d., p=0.064). Significant improvement in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score was observed in the 5mg b.i.d. group versus placebo on day 56 (LS mean -0.3, p=0.024). In the acute phase, 7% weight gain and the composite event of somnolence, sedation, and hypersomnia were more common in both asenapine groups than in the placebo group. Akathisia, fasting glucose elevation, and extrapyramidal syndrome were more common in the 5mg b.i.d. group than in the placebo group. There were no unexpected adverse events in the OLE, and PANSS total scores decreased by -16.1 points in the group previously treated with placebo (n=62) and by -11.2 points in the continuous asenapine group (n=131) from OLE baseline to week 26. Conclusions: Although improvements in PANSS total score at day 56 of the acute phase were numerically greater for both asenapine 2.5 and 5mg b.i.d. than for placebo and were maintained in the OLE, the primary end-point did not achieve statistical significance in the acute phase. No new or unexpected safety concerns were detected during the acute phase or after an additional 26 weeks of asenapine treatment in the adolescent population with schizophrenia. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT01190254 and NCT1190267 at ClinicalTrials.gov
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估阿塞那平在青少年精神分裂症中的安全性和有效性。方法:在一项为期8周的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验中,受试者(12-17岁)符合《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》第4版,文本修订(DSM-IV-TR)的标准精神分裂症按1:1的比例随机分配给安慰剂,阿塞那平2.5mg每日两次或阿塞那平5mg每日两次完成为期8周的急性研究的受试者可以参加为期26周的仅柔韧性剂量阿塞那平开放标签扩展(OLE)。结果:相似百分比的受试者在第56天完成治疗(2.5 mg b.i.d.(n = 98):83%; 5mg b.i.d. [n = 106]:79%;安慰剂[n = 102]:79%)。在对主要终点进行重复测量分析的混合模型中(使用Hochberg校正进行多重性检验),在第56天,阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分上的阿塞那平和安慰剂之间的最小二乘法(LS)均值差异没有显着性(对于2.5mg出价为-4.8,p = 0.070;对于5mg出价为-5.6,p = 0.064)。在5mg b.i.d.中观察到临床总体印象-严重性评分显着改善。组与安慰剂组在第56天比较(LS均值-0.3,p = 0.024)。在急性期,两个阿塞那平组的体重增加比安慰剂组更为常见,体重增加了7%,并且出现了嗜睡,镇静和失眠等复合事件。 5mg b.i.d.的运动障碍,空腹血糖升高和锥体外系综合征更为常见。组比安慰剂组。在OLE中没有意外的不良事件,并且从OLE基线到OLE之前,安慰剂组(n = 62)的PANSS总分降低了-16.1分,连续阿塞那平组(n = 131)的PANSS总分降低了-11.2分第26周。结论:尽管对于2.5毫克和5毫克的阿塞那平急性发作期,在急性期第56天PANSS总评分的改善在数值上更大与安慰剂相比,并维持在OLE中,主要终点在急性期未达到统计学意义。在患有精神分裂症的青少年人群中,在急性期或在阿塞那平治疗另外26周后,未发现新的或意外的安全隐患。临床试验注册处:ClinicalTrials.gov上的NCT01190254和NCT1190267

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号