首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >A combination of intrathecal morphine and remifentanil anesthesia for fast-track cardiac anesthesia and surgery.
【24h】

A combination of intrathecal morphine and remifentanil anesthesia for fast-track cardiac anesthesia and surgery.

机译:鞘内注射吗啡和瑞芬太尼麻醉相结合,用于快速心脏麻醉和手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the combined remifentanil and intrathecal morphine (RITM) anesthetic technique facilitates early extubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Referral center for cardiothoracic surgery at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 24) undergoing first-time elective CABG surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Two groups represented RITM (n = 12) and fentanyl-based (controls, n = 12) anesthesia. Premedication was standardized to temazepam, 0.4 mg/kg, and anesthesia was induced with etomidate, 0.3 mg/kg, in both groups. The RITM group received remifentanil, 1 microg/kg bolus followed by 0.25 to 1 microg/kg/min infusion, and intrathecal morphine, 2 mg. The control group received fentanyl, 12 microg/kg in 3 divided doses. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and pancuronium in both groups. After completion of surgery, the remifentanil infusion was stopped. Complete reversal of muscle relaxation was ensured with a nerve stimulator, and a propofol infusion, 0.5 to 3 mg/kg/h, was started in both groups. All patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) to receive standardized postoperative care. Intensivists and ICU nurses were blinded to the group assignment. Propofol infusion was stopped, and the tracheal extubation was accomplished when extubation criteria were fulfilled. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to demographic data and surgical characteristics. Extubation times were 156 +/- 82 minutes and 258 +/- 91 minutes in the RITM and control groups (p = 0.012). Patients in the RITM group exhibited lower visual analog scale pain scores during the first 2 hours after extubation (p < 0.04). Morphine requirements during the 24 hours after extubation were 2.5 +/- 3 mg in the RITM group and 16 +/- 11 mg in the control group (p = 0.0018). Sedation scores were lower in the RITM group during the first 3 hours after extubation (p < 0.03). Pulmonary function tests as assessed by spirometry were better in the RITM group at 6 and 12 hours after extubation (p < 0.04). There were no significant differences in PaO(2) and PaCO(2) after extubation between the 2 groups. None of the patients had episodes of apnea during the immediate 24-hour postextubation period. Two patients from the RITM group required reintubation on the second and sixth postoperative days. There were no differences in ICU and hospital length of stay between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the RITM technique provided earlier tracheal extubation, decreased level of sedation, excellent analgesia, and improved spirometry in the early postoperative period. The impact of RITM on ICU and hospital length of stay and potential cost benefits require further evaluation.
机译:目的:确定瑞芬太尼和鞘内吗啡(RITM)联合麻醉技术是否有助于冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)手术患者的早期拔管。设计:前瞻性,随机,对照临床试验。地点:大学医院心胸外科转诊中心。参加者:首次接受选择性CABG手术的患者(n = 24)。干预措施:两组分别代表RITM(n = 12)和基于芬太尼的麻醉(对照组,n = 12)。两组的用药标准化为替马西m 0.4 mg / kg,依托咪酯诱导麻醉为0.3 mg / kg。 RITM组接受瑞芬太尼1毫克/千克大剂量推注,然后输注0.25至1毫克/千克/分钟,鞘内注射吗啡2毫克。对照组分3次服用芬太尼12微克/千克。两组均用异氟烷和潘库溴铵维持麻醉。手术结束后,停止瑞芬太尼输注。用神经刺激器确保肌肉松弛完全逆转,两组均开始输注异丙酚0.5至3 mg / kg / h。所有患者均被转移到重症监护病房(ICU)接受标准化的术后护理。强化医生和ICU护士对小组作业不了解。当达到拔管标准时,停止输注异丙酚,并完成气管拔管。测量和主要结果:两组在人口统计学数据和手术特征方面相似。在RITM和对照组中,拔管时间分别为156 +/- 82分钟和258 +/- 91分钟(p = 0.012)。拔管后的前两个小时,RITM组的患者表现出较低的视觉模拟评分疼痛评分(p <0.04)。拔管后24小时内,吗啡需求量在RITM组为2.5 +/- 3 mg,在对照组为16 +/- 11 mg(p = 0.0018)。拔管后的前3个小时,RITM组的镇静分数较低(p <0.03)。拔管后6小时和12小时,通过肺活量测定评估的肺功能测试在RITM组中更好(p <0.04)。两组拔管后PaO(2)和PaCO(2)没有显着差异。在拔管后的24小时内,没有患者出现呼吸暂停发作。 RITM组的两名患者在术后第二天和第六天需要重新插管。两组之间的ICU和住院时间无差异。结论:RITM技术的实施提供了早期的气管拔管,降低的镇静水平,出色的镇痛作用以及术后早期的肺活量测定。 RITM对ICU和医院住院时间以及潜在成本收益的影响需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号