...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cancer education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education >Feasibility, acceptability and findings from a pilot randomized controlled intervention study on the impact of a book designed to inform patients about cancer clinical trials
【24h】

Feasibility, acceptability and findings from a pilot randomized controlled intervention study on the impact of a book designed to inform patients about cancer clinical trials

机译:可行性,可接受性和一项随机对照试验研究的结果,该研究涉及一本旨在向患者介绍癌症临床试验的书的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was conducted to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and changes in knowledge among cancer patients assigned to receive a 160-page book on experimental cancer therapies and clinical trials. We enrolled 20 patients with cancer who had never participated in a clinical trial and randomly assigned them to receive the book either during week 1 or week 4 of the study. We collected baseline patient demographic and cancer-related information as well as knowledge about cancer clinical trials at week 0. Follow-up surveys were administered at weeks 3 and 6 for both study groups. Comparisons were made within and between groups randomized to receive the book early (at week 1) to those who received it later (at week 4). One hundred percent of data were captured in both groups at baseline, which decreased to 77.8 % by week 6. The vast majority of participants found the book moderately or very useful (89 % in the Early Group at week 3 and 95.5 % in the Late Group at week 6). Within group pairwise comparisons found significant difference between baseline and week 6 in content-specific knowledge scores among participants in the Late Group [79 % versus 92.1 %, p∈=∈0.01). Global knowledge scores increased significantly for variables reflecting knowledge that promotes decisions to participate in clinical trials. Providing published reading material to patients with cancer is both feasible and acceptable. Offering information to patients about cancer clinical trials, using a book designed for patients with cancer may influence knowledge related to decision to participate in clinical trials.
机译:进行这项研究的目的是评估癌症患者的可行性,可接受性和知识变化,这些患者被分配接受关于实验性癌症治疗和临床试验的160页书籍。我们招募了20位从未参加过临床试验的癌症患者,并随机分配他们在研究的第1周或第4周接受这本书。我们在第0周收集了基线患者的人口统计学和与癌症相关的信息以及有关癌症临床试验的知识。两个研究组均在第3周和第6周进行了随访调查。在随机分配的组内和组之间进行比较,以较早(第1周)接受该书与较晚接受该书(第4周)的那些人。两组在基线时都捕获了100%的数据,到第6周时已下降到77.8%。绝大多数参与者发现这本书具有中等或非常有用的作用(第3周的早期组为89%,晚期的为95.5%。在第6周分组。在组内的成对比较中,晚期组参与者的特定内容知识得分在基线和第6周之间存在显着差异[79%对92.1%,p∈=∈0.01)。对于反映出有助于参加临床试验的决策的知识的变量,全球知识分数显着提高。向癌症患者提供出版的阅读材料既可行又可以接受。使用专为癌症患者设计的书向患者提供有关癌症临床试验的信息,可能会影响与参与临床试验的决定有关的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号