首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Comparison of effects of thoracic epidural and intravenous administration of lidocaine on target-controlled infusion of propofol and tracheal intubation response during induction of anesthesia
【24h】

Comparison of effects of thoracic epidural and intravenous administration of lidocaine on target-controlled infusion of propofol and tracheal intubation response during induction of anesthesia

机译:胸膜硬膜外和静脉注射利多卡因对麻醉诱导期间靶控丙泊酚输注和气管插管反应的影响比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and intravenous (IV) lidocaine on the effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) and the intubation-induced stress responses during general IV anesthesia induction. Design: A prospective, randomized trial. Setting: A university hospital. Participants: Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery for thoracotomies. Interventions: Patients scheduled for thoracotomies were divided into 3 groups as group TEA, group IV, and control group. Group TEA or group IV received the same doses but not the same concentration of lidocaine via TEA (0.15 mL/kg of 1.35% lidocaine) or IV (2 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine), respectively, 15 minutes before induction of anesthesia, and the control group received the same volume of 0.9% normal saline epidurally. Measurements and Main Results: Heart rate and mean arterial pressure as well as the time to loss of consciousness (LOC), total doses of propofol TCI, and Ce at LOC were recorded during anesthesia induction. Plasma lidocaine concentration detected was 1.9 (0.3) μg/mL in the IV group and 1.0 (0.3) μg/mL in the TEA group (p0.001). The time to LOC, total doses of propofol TCI, and Ce at LOC were significantly lower in the IV group than in the TEA group and the control group (p0.001). Both lidocaine groups showed significant decreases in the elevation of mean arterial pressure and heart rate and plasma concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine induced by intubation compared to the control group (p 0.05). Conclusion: Lidocaine administered via both TEA and IV decreased the induction doses of propofol and suppressed cardiovascular and stress responses to tracheal intubation. Administration of 2 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine IV was better, with no side effects of lidocaine toxicity.
机译:目的:比较胸腔硬膜外麻醉(TEA)和静脉内(IV)利多卡因对全身静脉麻醉诱导期间丙泊酚靶控输注(TCI)的作用部位浓度(Ce)和插管诱导的应激反应的影响。设计:一项前瞻性随机试验。地点:大学医院。参加者:60例因开胸手术接受择期手术的患者。干预措施:计划开胸手术的患者分为3组,分别为TEA组,IV组和对照组。在麻醉诱导前15分钟,TEA组或IV组分别通过TEA(0.15 mL / kg的1.35%利多卡因)或IV(2 mg / kg的2%利多卡因)接受相同剂量但不同浓度的利多卡因,对照组硬膜外给予相同体积的0.9%生理盐水。测量和主要结果:麻醉诱导期间记录心率和平均动脉压以及失去知觉的时间(LOC),丙泊酚TCI和Ce的总剂量。 IV组检测到的血浆利多卡因浓度为TE(1.9)(0.3)μg/ mL,TEA组为1.0(0.3)μg/ mL(p <0.001)。 IV组的LOC时间,丙泊酚TCI的总剂量和Ce在LOC的剂量显着低于TEA组和对照组(p <0.001)。与对照组相比,两组利多卡因组的平均动脉压和心率升高以及肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的血浆浓度均显着降低(p <0.05)。结论:通过TEA和IV给药的利多卡因降低了异丙酚的诱导剂量,并抑制了对气管插管的心血管和压力反应。 2 mg / kg的2%利多卡因IV的给药效果更好,没有利多卡因毒性的副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号