首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bone and mineral metabolism >Clinical effect of bisphosphonate and vitamin D on osteoporosis: reappraisal of a multicenter double-blind clinical trial comparing etidronate and alfacalcidol.
【24h】

Clinical effect of bisphosphonate and vitamin D on osteoporosis: reappraisal of a multicenter double-blind clinical trial comparing etidronate and alfacalcidol.

机译:双膦酸盐和维生素D对骨质疏松症的临床效果:重新评估比较依替膦酸和阿法骨化醇的多中心双盲临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As inhibitors of bone resorption, bisphosphonates and vitamin D derivatives have been extensively used for the treatment of osteoporosis in various parts of the world, but the clinical effects of these two groups of agents have rarely been compared in detail. A multicenter, prospective, double-blind controlled study was started comparing the effects of etidronate and alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol) in 414 patients with established osteoporosis from 36 centers. Among these patients, 135 were given 400 mg etidronate daily at bedtime for 2 weeks followed by 10 weeks off treatment, and this cycle was repeated four times along with a placebo indistinguishable from the alfacalcidol capsule daily throughout the 48 weeks of study (Group A, High Dose Etidronate Group). In 133 patients, 200 mg etidronate was used instead of 400 mg (Group B, Low Dose Etidronate Group). In 138 patients, 1 microg alfacalcidol was given daily throughout the 48-week study period along with a placebo indistinguishable from the etidronate tablet in four separate periods of 2 weeks (Group C, Control Group). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) was performed before the beginning of the study and every 12 weeks thereafter. Changes in spinal deformity were also assessed based on the lateral thoracic and lumbar spine X-ray films taken before and after the study. The lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) changes were +3.4% +/- 0.6% (mean +/- SEM) in Group A, +2.4% +/- 0.5% in Group B, and -0.5% +/- 0.4% in Group C, the former two being significantly higher than the last. New occurrence of spinal compression fracture was also significantly reduced in Group A compared to Group C. In patients without previous fracture at entry, incident fracture was 10.2% in Group C, but 0% in Groups A and B. In patients with prevalent fracture at entry, corresponding figures were 21.5% (Group C), 12.0% (Group A), and 13.2% (Group B), respectively. Alfacalcidol maintained lumbar spine BMD, preventing a decrease for 48 weeks, and etidronate significantly increased it further, demonstrating its usefulness in the treatment of established osteoporosis.
机译:作为骨吸收抑制剂,双膦酸盐和维生素D衍生物已在世界各地广泛用于治疗骨质疏松症,但很少对这两种药物的临床效果进行详细比较。开始了一项多中心,前瞻性,双盲对照研究,比较了依替膦酸盐和阿法骨化醇(1-α-羟基胆钙化固醇)对来自36个中心的414例骨质疏松患者的影响。在这些患者中,有135位患者每天在睡前接受400 mg依替膦酸治疗,持续2周,然后停药10周,并且在整个48周研究期间,重复此周期四次,同时每天服用与阿法骨化醇胶囊无区别的安慰剂(A组,大剂量依替膦酸盐组)。在133例患者中,使用200毫克依替膦酸盐代替400毫克(B组,低剂量依替膦酸盐组)。在138例患者中,在整个48周的研究期间内,每天服用1微克阿法骨化醇,以及在2个独立的2周内分别与依替膦酸盐片剂无区别的安慰剂(C组,对照组)。腰椎(L2-L4)的双能X线骨密度仪在研究开始前进行,其后每12周进行一次。脊柱畸形的变化也根据研究前后所拍摄的胸部和腰椎侧位X线片进行评估。 A组的腰椎骨矿物质密度(BMD)变化为+ 3.4%+/- 0.6%(平均+/- SEM),B组为+ 2.4%+/- 0.5%和-0.5%+/- 0.4 C组中的百分比,前两个明显高于最后一个。与C组相比,A组新发生的脊柱压缩性骨折也明显减少。在入组时既往没有骨折的患者中,C组的入射骨折为10.2%,而A和B组为0%。条目中,相应数字分别为21.5%(C组),12.0%(A组)和13.2%(B组)。阿法骨化醇维持腰椎骨密度,防止其降低48周,依替膦酸显着增加其骨密度,证明其在治疗既定骨质疏松症中的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号