...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials. >Evaluation of substrates for 90 degrees peel adhesion--a collaborative study. I. Medical tapes.
【24h】

Evaluation of substrates for 90 degrees peel adhesion--a collaborative study. I. Medical tapes.

机译:评估90度剥离粘合力的基材-一项合作研究。一,医用胶带。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

As part of a method development for peel testing, an interlaboratory comparison among Food and Drug Administration-Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration-Center for Devices and Radiological Health and Southwest Research Institute was conducted using medical tapes. The aim was to determine which readily available substrate [stainless steel (SS), high density polyethylene (HDPE) or Vitro-Skin(R)] would best distinguish among various medical tapes. Five medical tapes (3M 1523, 3M 1525L, 3M 1776, Mepiform(R) and Mediderm(R) 3505) were evaluated on four different substrates (SS, HDPE, Vitro-Skin, and human cadaver skin) using the following peel parameters: approximately 3 min dwell time, 90 degrees peel angle, and 300 mm/min peel rate. No substrate mimics cadaver skin for all five tapes. SS had the best ability to distinguish among the medical tapes. Overall, for quality control purposes (yielding good discrimination and precision), SS would be the optimal substrate.
机译:作为剥离测试方法开发的一部分,食品和药物管理局-药物评估与研究中心,食品和药物管理局-器械与放射卫生中心以及西南研究所之间进行了实验室间比较,使用的是医用胶带。目的是确定哪种现成的基材[不锈钢(SS),高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)或Vitro-Skin®]能最好地区分各种医用胶带。使用以下剥离参数在四种不同的基材(SS,HDPE,Vitro-Skin和人体尸体皮肤)上评估了五种医用胶带(3M 1523、3M 1525L,3M 1776,Mepiform®和Mediderm®3505):大约3分钟的停留时间,90度剥离角和300毫米/分钟的剥离速度。对于所有五个胶带,没有基材模拟尸体皮肤。 SS具有最好的区分医疗磁带的能力。总体而言,出于质量控制的目的(提供良好的区分度和精度),SS将是最佳的基材。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号