首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Results of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
【24h】

A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Results of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease

机译:颈椎间盘成形术与颈前路椎间盘切除术融合术(ACDF)治疗有症状颈椎病的Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a standard treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease, but pseudarthrosis and accelerated adjacent-level disc degeneration may develop. Cervical disc arthroplasty was developed to preserve the kinematics of the functional spinal unit. Trials comparing arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion have shown unclear benefits in terms of clinical results, neck motion at the operated level, adverse events, and the need for secondary surgical procedures.Methods: Only randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis, and the search strategy followed the requirements of the Cochrane Library Handbook. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each included study and extracted the relevant data.Results: Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials were included; twelve studies were Level I and fifteen were Level II. The results of the meta-analysis indicated longer operative times, more blood loss, lower neck and arm pain scores reported on a visual analog scale, better neurological success, greater motion at the operated level, fewer secondary surgical procedures, and fewer such procedures that involved supplemental fixation or revision in the arthroplasty group compared with the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion group. These differences were significant (p < 0.05). The two groups had similar lengths of hospital stay, Neck Disability Index scores, and rates of adverse events, removals, and reoperations (p > 0.05).Conclusions: The meta-analysis revealed that anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was associated with shorter operative times and less blood loss compared with arthroplasty. Other outcomes after arthroplasty (length of hospital stay, clinical indices, range of motion at the operated level, adverse events, and secondary surgical procedures) were superior or equivalent to the outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术是有症状的颈椎间盘疾病的标准治疗方法,但可能会发展为假关节和加速的邻近椎间盘退变。颈椎间盘置换术的发展是为了保留功能性脊柱单元的运动学。比较关节置换术与颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合术的试验在临床结果,手术水平的颈部运动,不良事件以及是否需要二次手术方面显示出不清楚的益处。方法:本荟萃分析仅包括随机临床试验,并且搜索策略遵循《科克伦图书馆手册》的要求。两名评价者独立评估了每个纳入研究的方法学质量并提取了相关数据。结果:纳入了27项随机临床试验。 I级有12项研究,II级有15项研究。荟萃分析的结果表明,在视觉模拟量表上报告的手术时间更长,失血更多,颈部和手臂疼痛评分更低,神经学上的成功率更高,手术水平上的动作更多,二次外科手术更少以及此类手术更少与前颈椎间盘切除术和融合组相比,置换术组需要进行补充固定或翻修。这些差异是显着的(p <0.05)。两组患者的住院时间,颈部残疾指数得分,不良事件发生率,清除率和再次手术率均相似(p> 0.05)。与关节置换术相比,出血量更少。关节置换术后的其他结局(住院时间,临床指标,手术水平的运动范围,不良事件和继发外科手术)优于或等同于颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后的结局。证据水平:治疗级别II 。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号