...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years.
【24h】

Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years.

机译:与羟基磷灰石涂层胫骨植入物相比,在初次全膝关节置换中采用水泥骨胫骨固定术。五年结果随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although excellent long-term results have been reported with cemented tibial fixation, cementless fixation as a means to improve the longevity of total knee prostheses continues to be of interest to clinicians. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between cementless tibial fixation with hydroxyapatite and cemented tibial fixation in the first five years following primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized clinical trial that included eighty-one patients with noninflammatory knee arthritis who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty when they were less than seventy years of age. The subjects were randomized at the time of surgery to be treated with either cementless tibial fixation with hydroxyapatite or cemented tibial fixation. Evaluations were performed preoperatively and at six months, one year, and five years postoperatively by a physical therapist who was blinded to group allocation. Self-reported pain and function, the primary outcomes, were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). Complications and revision rates were determined through a review of hospital records and at each patient evaluation. The Knee Society radiographic score was used to evaluate plain radiographs at each assessment. RESULTS: Seventy subjects (86%) completed the five-year assessment. Slightly more pain was reported in the hydroxyapatite group at six months as measured with both the WOMAC and the RAND-36, a difference that disappeared by one year postoperatively. No differences were seen in function, radiographic findings, or complications. No subject required revision of the tibial prosthesis during the study. CONCLUSIONS: At five years postoperatively, there is no difference between cementless tibial fixation with hydroxyapatite and cemented tibial fixation in terms of self-reported pain, function, health-related quality of life, postoperative complications, or radiographic scores.
机译:背景:尽管已报道了采用胫骨骨水泥固定术的长期效果极佳,但无骨水泥钉固定术作为提高全膝关节假体寿命的一种手段仍是临床医生关注的问题。这项研究的目的是比较在初次全膝关节置换术后的头五年中,非骨水泥胫骨固定术与羟基磷灰石固定术与胫骨水泥固定术的结果。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性,随机临床试验,其中包括81名非炎性膝关节炎患者,这些患者在不到70岁时接受了原发性全膝关节置换术。受试者在手术时被随机分配接受羟基磷灰石无骨水泥固定或胫骨骨水泥固定治疗。术前,术后六个月,一年和五年后,由不愿进行组分配的理疗师进行评估。自我报告的疼痛和功能(主要结局)通过西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学的骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和RAND 36项健康调查(RAND-36)进行了测量。并发症和翻修率通过回顾医院记录和每次患者评估来确定。每次评估时,均使用膝关节学会X光片评分来评估X光片。结果:70名受试者(86%)完成了五年评估。用WOMAC和RAND-36进行测量,在六个月时羟基磷灰石组的疼痛略有增加,这种差异在术后一年后消失。在功能,影像学发现或并发症方面均未见差异。在研究过程中,没有受试者需要对胫骨假体进行修订。结论:术后五年,羟基磷灰石非骨水泥胫骨固定与胫骨骨水泥固定在自我报告的疼痛,功能,与健康相关的生活质量,术后并发症或影像学评分方面无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号