首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biogeography >Assessing model fit in phylogeographical investigations: an example from the North American sandbar willow Salix melanopsis
【24h】

Assessing model fit in phylogeographical investigations: an example from the North American sandbar willow Salix melanopsis

机译:在植物地理调查中评估模型是否合适:以北美沙洲柳柳柳黑粉病为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim Coalescent models enable the direct estimation of parameters with clear biological relevance (i.e. divergence time, migration rate and rate of expansion), but they have typically been applied to phylogeographical research without a priori assessment of their fit to the empirical system. Here we explore the extent to which phylogeographical inference can be misled by evaluating the fit of several population genetic models to empirical data collected from the sandbar willow, Salix melanopsis. Location The Pacific Northwest mesic forest of North America. Methods We collected sequence data from five loci in 145 individuals. We assessed model fit in: (1) models delimiting previously proposed races within S. melanopsis; (2) historical biogeographical models, each describing the timing and pattern of diversification; and (3) coalescent models that correspond to those implemented in popular software packages such as IMa, lamarc, and Migrate-n. Results We found little evidence for previous hypotheses of cryptic races delimited by habitat type (mesic, lowland or subalpine); rather, our results suggested that these variants originated from the same source population. Historical biogeographical models demonstrate that S. melanopsis has recently expanded from a single refugial population, probably located in the northern Rocky Mountains. An analysis using approximate Bayesian computation indicated that the single population expansion model implemented in lamarc is a better fit to the data than multi-population models incorporating migration and/or divergence as implemented in Migrate-n and IMa, suggesting that the parameters estimated from the latter are potentially misleading for this system. Main conclusions Our research highlights the importance of assessing model fit in addition to estimating parameters to understand evolutionary processes. Taken together, they allow us to infer the historical demography of S. melanopsis in a manner that is not biased by previous work in the system.
机译:Aim Coalescent模型可以直接估计具有明确生物学相关性的参数(即发散时间,迁移速率和扩展速率),但通常将其用于系统地理学研究,而无需先验评估它们是否适合经验系统。在这里,我们通过评估几种种群遗传模型与从沙洲柳柳柳提取的经验数据的拟合度,来探索系统地理推断可被误导的程度。位置北美西北太平洋的中型森林。方法我们收集了来自145个个体的五个基因座的序列数据。我们评估了以下模型的拟合度:(1)界定先前提出的黑色葡萄球菌种族的模型; (2)历史生物地理模型,每个模型都描述了多元化的时间和方式; (3)与在流行的软件包(如IMa,lamarc和Migrate-n)中实现的模型相对应的合并模型。结果我们发现很少有证据支持先前由栖息地类型(中部,低地或亚高山)界定的隐性种族的假说。相反,我们的结果表明,这些变体源自相同的来源种群。历史的生物地理学模型表明,黑腹链球菌最近已从可能位于落基山脉北部的单一避难所种群扩展。使用近似贝叶斯计算的分析表明,与结合了Migrate-n和IMa的迁移和/或扩散的多种群模型相比,在lamarc中实现的单种群扩展模型更适合数据,这表明根据后者可能会误导该系统。主要结论我们的研究突出了评估模型拟合的重要性,除了估计参数以了解进化过程外。两者合计,它们使我们能够以不受系统中先前工作偏颇的方式来推断黑皮病的历史人口统计学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号