...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Bleeding Score.
【24h】

Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Bleeding Score.

机译:非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的主要出血基线风险:CRUSADE(可通过对ACC / AHA指南的早期实施来对不稳定型心绞痛患者进行快速风险分层以抑制不良预后)出血评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Treatments for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) reduce ischemic events but increase bleeding. Baseline prediction of bleeding risk can complement ischemic risk prediction for optimization of NSTEMI care; however, existing models are not well suited for this purpose. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed (n=71 277) and validated (n=17 857) a model that identifies 8 independent baseline predictors of in-hospital major bleeding among community-treated NSTEMI patients enrolled in the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Model performance was tested by c statistics in the derivation and validation cohorts and according to postadmission treatment (ie, invasive and antithrombotic therapy). The CRUSADE bleeding score (range 1 to 100 points) was created by assignment of weighted integers that corresponded to the coefficient of each variable. The rate of major bleeding increased by bleeding risk score quintiles: 3.1% for those at very low risk (score < or = 20); 5.5% for those at low risk (score 21-30); 8.6% for those at moderate risk (score 31-40); 11.9% for those at high risk (score 41-50); and 19.5% for those at very high risk (score >50; P(trend) <0.001). The c statistics for the major bleeding model (derivation=0.72 and validation=0.71) and risk score (derivation=0.71 and validation=0.70) were similar. The c statistics for the model among treatment subgroups were as follows: > or = 2 antithrombotics=0.72; <2 antithrombotics=0.73; invasive approach=0.73; conservative approach=0.68. CONCLUSIONS: The CRUSADE bleeding score quantifies risk for in-hospital major bleeding across all postadmission treatments, which enhances baseline risk assessment for NSTEMI care.
机译:背景:非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的治疗减少了缺血事件,但增加了出血。出血风险的基线预测可以补充缺血风险预测,以优化NSTEMI护理;但是,现有模型并不十分适合此目的。方法和结果:我们开发了(n = 71 277)并验证了(n = 17 857)模型,该模型确定了在不稳定心绞痛的快速风险分层中接受社区治疗的NSTEMI患者中院内主要出血的8个独立基线预测因子患者应尽早实施ACC ​​/ AHA指南(CRUSADE)质量改进计划,以抑制不良结果。在派生和验证队列中,并根据入院后治疗(即侵入性和抗血栓形成治疗),通过c统计量测试模型性能。通过分配与每个变量的系数相对应的加权整数,创建CRUSADE出血评分(范围为1至100分)。出血风险评分的五分位数增加了主要出血的比例:风险极低(得分<或= 20)者为3.1%;低危人群为5.5%(得分21-30);中度风险人群的得分为8.6%(得分31-40);高风险人群的得分为11.9%(得分41-50);高风险人群的得分为19.5%(得分> 50;趋势P <0.001)。主要出血模型的c统计量(导数= 0.72和验证= 0.71)和风险评分(导数= 0.71和验证= 0.70)相似。在治疗亚组中,模型的c统计量如下:>或= 2抗血栓药= 0.72; <2抗血栓药= 0.73;侵入性方法= 0.73;保守方法= 0.68。结论:CRUSADE出血评分量化了所有入院后治疗期间院内重大出血的风险,这增强了NSTEMI护理的基线风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号