首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Budesonide suspension nebulization treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with cough variant asthma: a multi-center observational study
【24h】

Budesonide suspension nebulization treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with cough variant asthma: a multi-center observational study

机译:布地奈德雾化雾化治疗小儿咳嗽变异性哮喘的多中心观察性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To describe the impact of nebulized budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) on guardian-reported symptoms in Chinese pediatric patients with cough variant asthma (CVA).Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, non-interventional study conducted at 39 Chinese sites. Patients with CVA aged5 years were classified according to the severity of baseline symptoms: mild (symptom score3) or severe (symptom score>3). Daytime and night-time symptom scores, disease control, use of bronchodilators, and improvements in symptoms control were compared after 1, 3, 5 and 7 weeks of treatment between groups. Results: Among 914 patients, 821 (89.8%) completed the 7-week treatment. Among all patients, 368 (40.3%) were classified as mild CVA and 529 (57.9%), as severe CVA. Symptom scores in the severe group were higher than those in the mild group at weeks 1, 3, and 5 (p< 0.05), but not at week 7 (p> 0.05). Further, more patients in the mild group achieved disease control at any time point (98.6% at 3 weeks and 99.7% at 7 weeks), compared with the patients in the severe group (p< 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring bronchodilators differed between the groups until week 5 (p< 0.001). No severe or drug-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Individualized BIS treatment should be formulated according to the severity of baseline symptoms in CVA patients. Patients with mild CVA showed improvement after a shorter treatment time, while patients with severe CVA might require a longer time to respond to the treatment.
机译:目的:描述布地奈德雾化吸入混悬液(BIS)对中国小儿咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)患者监护人报告的症状的影响。方法:这是一项对39名中国人进行的前瞻性,非干预性研究的二级分析。网站。根据基线症状的严重程度将5岁的CVA患者分类为轻度(症状评分3)或重度(症状评分> 3)。在治疗1、2、3、5和7周后比较两组之间的白天和晚上症状评分,疾病控制,支气管扩张剂的使用以及症状控制的改善。结果:在914例患者中,有821例(89.8%)完成了7周的治疗。在所有患者中,有368名(40.3%)被归为轻度CVA,而有529名(57.9%)被归为重度CVA。严重组的症状评分在第1、3和5周高于轻度组(p <0.05),但在第7周没有升高(p> 0.05)。此外,与重度组的患者相比,轻度组的患者在任何时间点都能实现疾病控制(3周时为98.6%,7周时为99.7%)(p <0.001)。直到第5周,两组之间需要使用支气管扩张剂的患者比例有所不同(p <0.001)。没有严重或药物相关不良事件的报道。结论:应根据CVA患者基线症状的严重程度制定个体化BIS治疗。轻度CVA的患者在较短的治疗时间后表现出改善,而重度CVA的患者可能需要更长的时间才能对治疗产生反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号