首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral education >Comparison of Constant Time Delay and Simultaneous Prompting Procedures:Teaching Functional Sight Words to Students with Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorder
【24h】

Comparison of Constant Time Delay and Simultaneous Prompting Procedures:Teaching Functional Sight Words to Students with Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorder

机译:恒定时延和同时提示程序的比较:向智障和自闭症谱系障碍学生教授功能视力单词

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Constant time delay (CTD) and simultaneous prompting (SP) are effective response prompting procedures for teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of CTD and SP when teaching functional sight words to four students, 8-11 years of age, with moderate intellectual disability (ID) or dual diagnosis of moderate ID and autism spectrum disorder. An adapted alternating treatments design was used to evaluate the efficiency of CTD and SP procedures in regard to (a) percent of training errors, (b) total number of sessions, (c) mean minutes of training time, and (d) total number of trials through criterion. Results indicated that CTD resulted in fewer errors and SP required less instructional time, with mixed results for number of sessions and trials through criterion.
机译:恒定时间延迟(CTD)和同时提示(SP)是有效的响应提示程序,可用于教导中度至重度残疾的学生。这项研究的目的是比较CTD和SP在向4名8-11岁,具有中度智力障碍(ID)或中度ID和自闭症谱系障碍的双重诊断的学生教授功能性视觉单词时的效率。使用经过调整的交替治疗设计来评估CTD和SP程序在以下方面的效率:(a)训练错误的百分比,(b)会话总数,(c)训练时间的平均分钟数和(d)总数通过标准进行试验。结果表明,CTD导致的错误更少,而SP所需的指导时间更少,并且根据标准,课程数量和试验次数的混合结果也不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号