首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Remote Sensing >Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers
【24h】

Remote detection of flowering Somei Yoshino (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park using IKONOS imagery: comparison of hard and soft classifiers

机译:使用IKONOS影像远程检测城市公园内开花的吉野樱(梅树x yedoensis):硬分类器和软分类器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Identification of flowering trees in urban areas is challenging due to weak spectral signals and the high heterogeneity of urban landscapes. We hypothesized that a soft classifier, such as mixture tuned matched filtering (MTMF), would be better able to identify pixels including blooming cherry trees than a hard classifier such as maximum likelihood (ML). To test this hypothesis, we compared the accuracy of MTMF and ML in classifying blossoms of Somei Yoshino cherry trees (Prunus x yedoensis) in an urban park in Tokyo using IKONOS imagery. An accuracy assessment demonstrated that the MTMF classifier (overall accuracy: 62.2%, kappa coefficient: 0.507, and user's accuracy of SY: 48.1%) performed better than ML in identifying flowering SY (overall accuracy 48.7% with kappa accuracy: 0.321 and user's accuracy of blooming SY: 38.9%). Our results suggest that both methods are able to classify cherry blossoms in an urban landscape, but MTMF is more accurate than ML. However, the producer's accuracy of MTMF (72.7%) was slightly lower than ML (77.7%), suggesting that the accuracy of MTMF could decrease due to the limited number of available bands (four for IKONOS) and the existence of endmembers, such as dry grass in this study, with stronger signals than flowers. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
机译:由于光谱信号弱和城市景观的高度异质性,在城市地区鉴定开花树木具有挑战性。我们假设软分类器(如混合调谐匹配滤波(MTMF))比硬分类器(如最大似然(ML))能够更好地识别包括盛开的樱花树的像素。为了验证该假设,我们使用IKONOS图像比较了MTMF和ML在对东京城市公园的染井吉野樱(Prunus x yedoensis)的花朵进行分类时的准确性。准确性评估表明,MTMF分类器(总体准确性:62.2%,kappa系数:0.507,用户的SY准确性:48.1%)在识别开花SY方面(总体准确性为48.7%,kappa准确性为0.321)和用户准确性方面的表现优于ML。 SY的百分比:38.9%)。我们的结果表明,两种方法都能够对城市景观中的樱花进行分类,但MTMF比ML更准确。但是,生产商的MTMF准确性(72.7%)略低于ML(77.7%),这表明MTMF的准确性可能会下降,这是由于可用频段的数量有限(IKONOS为四个)以及端成员的存在,例如在这项研究中,干草比鲜花具有更强的信号。 (C)作者。由SPIE根据Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号