首页> 外文期刊>Journal of AOAC International >Comparison of petrifilmTM Staph Express Count System with the Bacteriological Analytical Manual direct-plating method for enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in artificially contaminated hard cheese.
【24h】

Comparison of petrifilmTM Staph Express Count System with the Bacteriological Analytical Manual direct-plating method for enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in artificially contaminated hard cheese.

机译:将petrifilmTM Staph Express Count系统与细菌分析手册直接电镀方法进行比较,以计算人工污染的硬质奶酪中的金黄色葡萄球菌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 3M PetrifilmTM Staph Express Count System was compared with the US FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) direct-plate count method for the enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in 6 types of artificially contaminated hard cheese (Asiago, Cheddar, Gruyere, Parmesan, Romano and Swiss). 5 different samples of each cheese type were inoculated with S. aureus (ATCC 25923) to achieve low, medium and high inoculum levels. S. aureus was enumerated by the Petrifilm and BAM methods, and the results were compared. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant differences (P < 0.05) between the 2 methods. The Petrifilm method compared favorably with the BAM procedure. The rapid method was more convenient to use, considerably faster and less expensive to perform than the BAM method.
机译:将3M PetrifilmTM Staph Express计数系统与美国FDA的细菌分析手册(BAM)直板计数方法进行了比较,以计数6种类型的人工污染的硬质奶酪中的金黄色葡萄球菌(Asiago,Cheddar,Gruyere,Parmesan,Romano和Swiss )。用金黄色葡萄球菌(ATCC 25923)接种每种干酪类型的5个不同样品,以实现低,中和高接种量。用Petrifilm和BAM方法对金黄色葡萄球菌进行计数,并对结果进行比较。多变量方差分析显示两种方法之间无显着差异(P <0.05)。 Petrifilm方法与BAM方法相比具有优势。与BAM方法相比,快速方法使用起来更方便,执行起来更快,成本更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号