首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry >Industrial wine making: Comparison of must clarification treatments
【24h】

Industrial wine making: Comparison of must clarification treatments

机译:工业酿酒:必须澄清的处理方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Three solid-liquid separation techniques, vacuum filtration, centrifugation, and settling, were used prior to fermentation to clarify musts from two different white grape varieties (Vitis vinifera var. Parellada and Macabeo) on an industrial scale. Solid content and ammonium and amino acid concentrations were analyzed before and after clarification, and sugar, ethanol, glycerol, n-propyl alcohol, isoamyl alcohol, and ethyl acetate compositions were monitored during the fermentations to determine how the clarification treatment affected the fermentation rate and higher alcohol production. The results show that vacuum filtration gives musts with the lowest solid content, and this means longer fermentation time, lower isoamyl alcohol production, and greater ethyl acetate formation. However, the three industrial clarification techniques studied caused no significant differences in the initial amount of ammonium nitrogen and total free amino acids. [References: 20]
机译:在发酵之前,使用了三种固液分离技术,即真空过滤,离心分离和沉降,以工业规模澄清来自两个不同白葡萄品种(葡萄属葡萄,Parellada和Macabeo)的葡萄汁。在澄清之前和之后分析固体含量以及铵和氨基酸浓度,并在发酵过程中监测糖,乙醇,甘油,正丙醇,异戊醇和乙酸乙酯的组成,以确定澄清处理如何影响发酵速率和酒精产量更高。结果表明,真空过滤使芥末的固体含量最低,这意味着更长的发酵时间,更低的异戊醇生成量和更大的乙酸乙酯形成量。但是,研究的三种工业澄清技术在铵态氮的初始量和总游离氨基酸上没有引起显着差异。 [参考:20]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号