...
首页> 外文期刊>Japanese journal of clinical oncology. >Artificial neural network analysis for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in the Japanese population.
【24h】

Artificial neural network analysis for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in the Japanese population.

机译:人工神经网络分析可预测日本人群临床局限性前列腺癌的病理分期。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although prostate cancer has been prevalent in Japan, there has been no particular model for predicting the pathological stage in the Japanese population. We examined whether artificial neural network analysis (ANNA), which is a relatively new diagnostic tool in prostate cancer, can be one of the predictive methods for predicting organ confinement, compared with the traditional logistic regression model, in the Japanese population for the first time. METHODS: The study population comprised 178 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institutions between October 1992 and May 1999. As additional pretreatment parameters to the preoperative serum PSA level, clinical TNM classification and biopsy Gleason score, the percentage of number of cores exhibiting traces of tumor, maximum tumor length in biopsy cores, PSA density and patient age were used. The predictive ability of ANNA with several parameters for a set of 36 randomly selected test data was compared with those of logistic regression analysis and 'Partin Tables' by area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 178 patients, 97 (54.5%) had organ-confined disease but 81 (45.5%) had locally advanced disease. With three parameters, the area under the ROC curve of ANNA (0.825 +/- 0.071) was larger than those for logistic regression (0.782 +/- 0.079) and Partin Tables (0.756 +/- 0.087), but not to a significant extent (P = 0.690 and 0.541). Although the expansion of the parameters did not increase the difference in area under the ROC curve between the best ANNA and logistic regression (0.899 +/- 0.053 and 0.873 +/- 0.065, respectively), the difference between the best ANNA and Partin Tables did not reach but approached statistical significance (P = 0.157). CONCLUSION: Although more modeling optimization is necessary to improve the predictive accuracy and generalizability of ANNA, we suggest that there is the possibility for this new predictive method to evolve in the analysis of clinical staging of prostate cancer.
机译:背景:尽管前列腺癌在日本已经很普遍,但尚无用于预测日本人群病理分期的特定模型。我们检查了人工神经网络分析(ANNA),这是一种相对较新的前列腺癌诊断工具,与传统的Logistic回归模型相比,在日本人群中是否可以作为预测器官受限的预测方法之一? 。方法:研究人群包括178名在1992年10月至1999年5月间在我们的机构中​​接受了根治性前列腺切除术的男性。作为术前血清PSA水平,临床TNM分类和活检格里森评分的其他预处理参数,显示出痕迹的核心数量百分比肿瘤,活检芯中最大肿瘤长度,PSA密度和患者年龄被使用。在接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线分析下,按面积比较了具有36个随机选择的测试数据的ANNA的预测能力与逻辑回归分析和“分表”的预测能力。结果:在178例患者中,有97例(54.5%)患有器官受限疾病,而81例(45.5%)患有局部晚期疾病。使用三个参数,ANNA的ROC曲线下面积(0.825 +/- 0.071)大于逻辑回归(0.782 +/- 0.079)和Partin Tables(0.756 +/- 0.087)的面积,但幅度不大(P = 0.690和0.541)。尽管参数的扩展并没有增加最佳ANNA和逻辑回归之间的ROC曲线下面积的差异(分别为0.899 +/- 0.053和0.873 +/- 0.065),但是最佳ANNA和Partin Tables之间的差异确实未达到,但已达到统计学显着性(P = 0.157)。结论:尽管需要更多的模型优化来提高ANNA的预测准确性和可推广性,但我们建议这种新的预测方法有可能在前列腺癌的临床分期分析中发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号