首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >The value of reflexivity in resolving ethical dilemmas research in care homes.
【24h】

The value of reflexivity in resolving ethical dilemmas research in care homes.

机译:自反性在解决护理院伦理困境研究中的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: This paper highlights ethical dilemmas experienced by researchers when undertaking qualitative inquiry with vulnerable older people in care homes. Scenarios from research that adopted a constructivist approach illustrate a range of ethical dilemmas and propose practical strategies. BACKGROUND: The importance of ethical comportment within qualitative inquiry is uncontested within the literature. Ethical guidelines exist to support qualitative researchers, but there appears limited consensus on how these are applied. Subsequently, ethical conduct in qualitative research relies heavily on researcher reflexivity and the development of positive relationships with participants. Although these aspects are widely recognized, there is limited literature on how this is achieved in the research process. DISCUSSION: In-depth analysis of confidentiality, privacy and informed consent supports researchers in navigating these ethical issues in care homes research. Placing the older person at the centre of ethical decisions enables the researcher to consider simultaneously the context and relationships that exist. This promotes a transparent process that demonstrates ethical sensitivity. CONCLUSION: When involved in ethical decisions in care homes, researchers are encouraged to consider how each participant may engage in a consultative process, acknowledging that they are a person living in a social world, interacting with both researcher and their environment. This approach promotes the inclusion of older people in decisions affecting the research process.
机译:目的:本文重点介绍了研究人员在与养老院中的弱势老年人进行定性询问时遇到的伦理困境。采用建构主义方法的研究场景说明了一系列道德困境,并提出了切实可行的策略。背景:在质性探究中,道德相称的重要性在文献中无可争议。存在道德准则以支持定性研究人员,但是在如何应用这些准则方面似乎存在有限的共识。随后,定性研究中的道德行为在很大程度上取决于研究者的反思性和与参与者之间积极关系的发展。尽管这些方面已得到广泛认可,但有关如何在研究过程中实现这一目标的文献有限。讨论:对机密性,隐私和知情同意书的深入分析支持研究人员在养老院研究中解决这些道德问题。将老年人置于道德决策的中心位置,使研究人员可以同时考虑存在的上下文和关系。这促进了显示道德敏感性的透明过程。结论:在参与养老院的道德决策时,鼓励研究人员考虑每个参与者如何参与咨询过程,并承认他们是一个生活在社会世界中的人,并与研究人员及其环境互动。这种方法促进老年人参与影响研究过程的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号