首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Effect of sulfur content in wet or dry distillers grains fed at several inclusions on cattle growth performance, ruminal parameters, and hydrogen sulfide.
【24h】

Effect of sulfur content in wet or dry distillers grains fed at several inclusions on cattle growth performance, ruminal parameters, and hydrogen sulfide.

机译:以不同夹杂物形式饲喂的干酒糟或干酒糟中的硫含量对牛的生长性能,瘤胃参数和硫化氢的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effects of S from wet or dry distillers grains with solubles (DGS) containing 0.82 or 1.16% S on animal growth performance, carcass characteristics, apparent total tract digestibility, and ruminal parameters were evaluated. In Exp. 1, crossbred beef steers (n=120; 345+or-34 kg BW) were individually fed ad libitum using Calan gates. Treatments were applied as a 2x2x3+1 factorial treatment arrangement with factors of DGS type (wet or dry), S content in DGS (0.82 or 1.16% DM basis), and DGS inclusion (20, 30, and 40%, DM basis), as well as a corn control diet (no DGS). In Exp. 2, ruminally cannulated crossbred beef steers (n=6; 381+or-31 kg BW) were assigned to 1 of 5 diets in a 5x6 unbalanced Latin Square design and fed ad libitum through five 14-d periods. A 2x2+1 factorial treatment arrangement was used with the factors of DGS type and S content in DGS (similar to Exp. 1). Inclusion of DGS was 40%, except for a MATCH diet containing wet 1.16% S DGS included at 31.4% (DM basis). Intake of DM decreased linearly (P<0.01) and quadratically (P<0.01) for steers fed wet and dry DGS that was 1.16% S, respectively. In addition, steers fed dry DGS consumed 9% more DM (P<0.01) than those fed wet. Gain decreased linearly (P=0.02) when wet 1.16% S DGS increased in the diet, representing a 12% drop in ADG between the Control and 40% DGS inclusion. A quadratic (P=0.02) improvement in G:F was observed for steers fed wet DGS compared with dry, regardless of S content (P=0.52). Feeding diets with wet 1.16% S DGS linearly decreased (P=0.03) HCW. In Exp. 2, molar proportion of propionate declined (P=0.01) 9% and A:P ratio tended (P=0.13) to be greater when 1.16 compared with 0.82% S DGS was fed. Apparent total tract DMD was not affected (P>0.16) and only subtle changes (P<0.01) in ruminal pH parameters were observed. Greater (P=0.02) ruminal H2S concentration for steers fed wet compared with dry DGS was observed, while 1.16% S DGS tended (P=0.12) to produce greater ruminal H2S than 0.82% S. Sulfur in wet DGS appears to be more prone to be converted to ruminal H2S, because feeding 1.16% S as wet DGS had a greater impact on ADG, DMI, and ruminal H2S compared with dry DGS.
机译:评估了湿或干酒糟中含有0.82或1.16%S的可溶物(DGS)的S对动物生长性能,car体特性,表观总道消化率和瘤胃参数的影响。在实验中如图1所示,使用Calan闸门分别随意喂杂种牛(n = 120; BW 345 +或-34 kg)。采用2x2x3 + 1阶乘处理安排进行处理,其中包括DGS类型(湿或干),DGS中的S含量(0.82或1.16%DM基准)和DGS包含(20、30和40%,DM基准)以及玉米对照饮食(不含DGS)。在实验中如图2所示,在5x6的不平衡拉丁方设计中,将瘤胃插管的杂交牛肉ste牛(n = 6; 381+或-31 kg BW)分配给5种饮食中的1种,并在五个14天的时间内随意喂养。使用2x2 + 1阶乘处理安排,其中包含DGS类型和DGS中S含量的因子(类似于实验1)。包含DGS的含量为40%,但MATCH日粮中含有31.4%(以DM为基准)的湿DGS为1.16%。饲喂干湿DGS和干DGS的ste牛的DM摄入量分别线性下降(P <0.01)和二次下降(P <0.01),硫含量为1.16%。此外,饲喂干DGS的ers牛比饲喂干DGS的牛多消耗9%的DM(P <0.01)。当日粮中湿的1.16%S DGS增加时,增益线性下降(P = 0.02),这表示对照和40%DGS夹杂物的ADG下降了12%。饲喂湿DGS的dry牛与干ste相比,G:F的平方改善(P = 0.02),与S含量无关(P = 0.52)。用1.16%的湿S DGS喂养的日粮HCW呈线性下降(P = 0.03)。在实验中如图2所示,当进料1.16时,与0.82%S DGS相比,丙酸酯的摩尔比例下降(P = 0.01)9%,并且A∶P比趋于(P = 0.13)更大。表观总道DMD没有受到影响(P> 0.16),而瘤胃pH参数仅观察到细微的变化(P <0.01)。与干DGS相比,湿饲ste牛的瘤胃H 2 S浓度更高(P = 0.02),而1.16%S DGS倾向于(P = 0.12)产生更大的瘤胃H 2 < / sub> S高于0.82%S。湿DGS中的硫似乎更易于转化为瘤胃H 2 S,因为以湿DGS喂养1.16%S对ADG,DMI的影响更大以及瘤胃H 2 S与干DGS的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号