首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium.
【24h】

Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium.

机译:补充益生菌,噬菌体或有机酸的饲料或发酵豆粕对受肠沙门氏菌血清型鼠伤寒沙门氏菌攻击的生长猪的生长性能,急性期反应和细菌脱落的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 28-d experiment evaluated the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding patterns in pigs (n = 108; initially, 38.7 +or- 6.7 kg) fed 6 treatment diets, including a control diet with no antimicrobial agents (CON), a positive control diet containing chlortetracycline, 100 mg/kg (CT), a diet containing anti-Salmonella Typhimurium bacteriophage, 3 x 109 plaque-forming units/kg of feed (ASB), Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP56, 6.5 x 108 cfu/kg of feed (LP), 0.2% microencapsulated organic acids (MOA), or 5% fermented soybean meal (FSM). Pigs were fed the diets for 2 wk before and 2 wk after challenging orally with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium (SalT). Before bacterial challenge, ADFI was similar in all groups. After SalT challenge, ADFI of CON pigs was less (P < 0.05) than all other groups. Before challenge, pigs on MOA, FSM, and CT diets had greater (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F than CON pigs. After challenge (wk 3 to 4) and during the overall experimental period (wk 1 to 4), ADG of all treatment groups and G:F of all treatment groups except the LP group were greater (P < 0.05) than those of CON pigs. Relative to all other treatments, CON and LP pigs had greater (P < 0.05) bacterial shedding scores on d 7 after SalT challenge. At d 14 postchallenge, shedding scores declined (P < 0.05) in all treatment groups compared with CON pigs. Serum haptoglobin for all treatment groups increased from d 0 concentrations on d 6 postchallenge and declined to prechallenge concentrations on d 13 (P < 0.05). Circulating IGF-I concentrations declined from 2 to 6 d postchallenge and increased again by d 13 in ASB and LP groups, did not decline in FSM and CT groups, and continuously declined through d 13 in CON and LP groups (P < 0.05). However, in MOA group, IGF-I concentrations declined from preinfection concentrations on d 2, increased on d 4, and declined again until d 13 (P < 0.05). The serum concentrations of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-1 beta were not generally affected by SalT challenge. In conclusion, acute infection of growing pigs with SalT was associated with short-term febrile responses in most pigs and reductions in ADFI and ADG of CON pigs. Compared with the CON diet, ASB, FSM, and MOA diets had a similar benefit to the antibiotic-supplemented diet in improving the performance of growing pigs, especially after bacterial challenge. However, further work needs to be done to better understand their mode of action in this class of pigs.
机译:一项28天的实验评估了饲喂6种治疗饮食的猪(n = 108;最初为38.7±6.7 kg)的生长性能,急性期反应和细菌脱落模式,其中包括不含抗菌剂的对照饮食(CON ),含金霉素四环素的阳性对照饮食,100 mg / kg(CT),含抗鼠伤寒沙门氏菌噬菌体,3 x 10 9 噬菌斑形成单位/ kg的饮食饲料(ASB),植物乳杆菌CJLP56、6.5 x 10 8 cfu / kg饲料(LP),0.2%微囊化有机酸(MOA)或5%发酵豆粕(FSM)。在口服沙门氏菌血清型鼠伤寒沙门氏菌(SalT)之前,对猪进行2周和2周后的饲喂。在细菌攻击之前,所有组的ADFI均相似。在SalT攻击后,CON猪的ADFI低于所有其他组( P <0.05)。攻击前,采用MOA,FSM和CT饮食的猪的ADG和G:F高于(CON)猪( P <0.05)。攻击后(第3至4周)和整个实验期间(第1至4周),除LP组外,所有治疗组的ADG和所有治疗组的G:F均较大( P < 0.05)比CON猪高。相对于所有其他处理方法,SalT​​攻击后第7天,CON和LP猪的细菌脱落得分更高( P <0.05)。攻击后第14天,与CON猪相比,所有治疗组的脱落评分均下降( P <0.05)。所有治疗组的血清触珠蛋白从攻击后第6天的d 0浓度增加,到攻击第13天的攻击前浓度降低( P <0.05)。循环IGF-I浓度从攻击后第2天下降至第6天,ASB和LP组中第13天再次升高,FSM和CT组中没有下降,CON和LP组中第13天持续下降( P < / i> 0.05)。然而,在MOA组中,IGF-I的浓度从感染前的第2天开始下降,在第4天上升,直到第13天再次下降( P <0.05)。 SalT攻击通常不会影响细胞因子IL-6和IL-1β的血清浓度。总之,SalT​​对生长中猪的急性感染与大多数猪的短期发热反应以及CON猪的ADFI和ADG降低有关。与CON饲料相比,ASB,FSM和MOA饲料在提高生长猪的生长性能方面,与补充抗生素的饲料具有相似的益处,尤其是在细菌攻击后。但是,需要做进一步的工作以更好地了解它们在此类猪中的作用方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号