首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium1
【24h】

Effect of probiotic-, bacteriophage-, or organic acid-supplemented feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding of grower pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium1

机译:补充益生菌,噬菌体或有机酸的饲料或发酵豆粕对肠炎沙门氏菌血清型鼠伤寒沙门氏菌攻击的生长猪的生长性能,急性期反应和细菌脱落的影响1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 28-d experiment evaluated the growth performance, acute-phase response, and bacterial shedding patterns in pigs (n = 108; initially, 38.7 ± 6.7 kg) fed 6 treatment diets, including a control diet with no antimicrobial agents (CON), a positive control diet containing chlortetracycline, 100 mg/kg (CT), a diet containing anti-Salmonella Typhimurium bacteriophage, 3 x 10^sup 9^ plaque-forming units/kg of feed (ASB), Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP56, 6.5 x 10^sup 8^ cfu/kg of feed (LP), 0.2% microencapsulated organic acids (MOA), or 5% fermented soybean meal (FSM). Pigs were fed the diets for 2 wk before and 2 wk after challenging orally with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium (SalT). Before bacterial challenge, ADFI was similar in all groups. After SalT challenge, ADFI of CON pigs was less (P < 0.05) than all other groups. Before challenge, pigs on MOA, FSM, and CT diets had greater (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F than CON pigs. After challenge (wk 3 to 4) and during the overall experimental period (wk 1 to 4), ADG of all treatment groups and G:F of all treatment groups except the LP group were greater (P < 0.05) than those of CON pigs. Relative to all other treatments, CON and LP pigs had greater (P < 0.05) bacterial shedding scores on d 7 after SalT challenge. At d 14 postchallenge, shedding scores declined (P < 0.05) in all treatment groups compared with CON pigs. Serum haptoglobin for all treatment groups increased from d 0 concentrations on d 6 postchallenge and declined to prechallenge concentrations on d 13 (P < 0.05). Circulating IGF-I concentrations declined from 2 to 6 d postchallenge and increased again by d 13 in ASB and LP groups, did not decline in FSM and CT groups, and continuously declined through d 13 in CON and LP groups (P < 0.05). However, in MOA group, IGF-I concentrations declined from preinfection concentrations on d 2, increased on d 4, and declined again until d 13 (P < 0.05). The serum concentrations of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β were not generally affected by SalT challenge. In conclusion, acute infection of growing pigs with SalT was associated with short-term febrile responses in most pigs and reductions in ADFI and ADG of CON pigs. Compared with the CON diet, ASB, FSM, and MOA diets had a similar benefit to the antibiotic-supplemented diet in improving the performance of growing pigs, especially after bacterial challenge. However, further work needs to be done to better understand their mode of action in this class of pigs. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:一项28天的实验评估了饲喂6种治疗饮食的猪(n = 108;最初为38.7±6.7千克)的生长性能,急性期反应和细菌脱落模式,其中包括不含抗菌剂(CON)的对照饮食,阳性对照日粮,其中含有金霉素,100 mg / kg(CT),日粮中含有抗鼠伤寒沙门氏菌噬菌体,3 x 10 ^ sup 9 ^噬菌斑形成单位/ kg饲料(ASB),植物乳杆菌CJLP56、6.5 x 10补充8 cfu / kg的饲料(LP),0.2%的微囊化有机酸(MOA)或5%的发酵豆粕(FSM)。口服沙门氏菌血清型鼠伤寒沙门氏菌(SalT)攻击猪之前和之后的2周和2周。在细菌攻击之前,所有组的ADFI均相似。在SalT攻击后,CON猪的ADFI低于所有其他组(P <0.05)。攻击前,接受MOA,FSM和CT饮食的猪的ADG和G:F高于(CON)猪(P <0.05)。攻击后(第3至4周)和整个实验期间(第1至4周),除LP组外,所有治疗组的ADG和所有治疗组的G:F均大于CON猪(P <0.05) 。相对于所有其他处理方法,SalT​​攻击后第7天,CON和LP猪的细菌脱落评分更高(P <0.05)。攻击后第14天,与CON猪相比,所有治疗组的脱落评分均下降(P <0.05)。所有治疗组的血清触珠蛋白从攻击后第6天的d 0浓度增加,到攻击第13天的challenge浓度下降(P <0.05)。循环IGF-I浓度从攻击后2 d下降到6 d,在ASB和LP组中再次升高d 13,在FSM和CT组中没有降低,在CON和LP组中持续下降到d 13(P <0.05)。但是,在MOA组中,IGF-I的浓度从感染前的第2天开始下降,在第4天增加,直到第13天再次下降(P <0.05)。 SalT攻击通常不会影响细胞因子IL-6和IL-1β的血清浓度。总之,SalT​​对生长中猪的急性感染与大多数猪的短期发热反应以及CON猪的ADFI和ADG降低有关。与CON日粮相比,ASB日粮,FSM日粮和MOA日粮在提高生长猪的生长性能方面,与补充抗生素的日粮具有相似的益处,尤其是在细菌攻击后。但是,需要做进一步的工作以更好地了解它们在此类猪中的作用方式。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号