...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Differentiation of bipolar i and II disorders by examining for differences in severity of manic/hypomanic symptoms and the presence or absence of psychosis during that phase
【24h】

Differentiation of bipolar i and II disorders by examining for differences in severity of manic/hypomanic symptoms and the presence or absence of psychosis during that phase

机译:通过检查躁狂/低躁狂症状的严重程度以及在该阶段是否存在精神病来区分双相性I和II型障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: DSM-IV criteria for mania/hypomania overlap considerably. We sought to examine the utility of a model differentiating bipolar I and II disorders by weighting the presence or absence of psychosis during manic/hypomanic episodes as opposed to simply weighting symptom severity. Methods: A set of 632 patients with a so-assigned clinical bipolar I or II disorder diagnosis contributed to the principal analyses, and a subset of 210 was included in a comparative analyses of DSM-assigned diagnoses. We also examined the impact of duration of highs on symptom patterns and the extent to which depressive episodes were psychotic or non-psychotic melancholic in type. Results: There were no group differences for bipolar I and II patients (clinical or DSM groups) by age, gender, age of onset or age of formal bipolar diagnosis. Clinically assigned bipolar I patients returned higher severity scores than bipolar II patients on manic/hypomanic symptoms, but such differentiation was limited. Clinically-assigned bipolar I patients were more likely than bipolar II patients to be diagnosed with psychotic depression, and had lower rates of non-melancholic depression. Duration of highs had some impact on the phenomenology of highs, but not on the phenomenology of depression. Limitations: We cannot establish the degree to hich clinicians validly differentiated those with bipolar disorder, and accurately judged the lifetime presence of psychotic features and of depressive subtype differentiation. Conclusions: Findings support the utility of an alternative model to DSM-IV in weighting the respective presence or absence of psychotic symptoms during highs in differentiating bipolar I and II disorders.
机译:背景:躁狂/低躁狂的DSM-IV标准有很多重叠之处。我们试图通过加权躁狂/低躁狂发作期间是否存在精神病,而不是简单地加权症状严重程度,来研究区分双相性I和II型障碍的模型的实用性。方法:一组632例具有这样的临床双相I或II型双相情感障碍诊断的患者参与了主要分析,并且在DSM分配的诊断的比较分析中包括了210个子集。我们还检查了持续时间高对症状模式的影响以及抑郁发作为精神病性或非精神病性忧郁症的程度。结果:I,II型双相情感障碍患者(临床或DSM组)在年龄,性别,发病年龄或正式的双相诊断年龄方面无组别差异。临床上指定的双相I型患者在躁狂/低躁狂症状方面的严重程度评分高于双相II型患者,但这种区分受到限制。临床指定的双相I型患者比双相I型患者更有可能被诊断为精神病性抑郁,并且非忧郁性抑郁症的发生率较低。高潮的持续时间对高潮的现象学有一些影响,但对抑郁症的现象没有影响。局限性:我们无法确定找到临床医师有效区分患有躁郁症的人的程度,并不能准确判断终生存在的精神病特征和抑郁亚型的分化程度。结论:研究结果支持DSM-IV替代模型在权衡双相I型和II型双相情感障碍高峰期精神病症状的存在或不存在时的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号