首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults.
【24h】

Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults.

机译:在重病住院的成年人中使用心肺复苏相关的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: The epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders for hospitalized patients has been reported, but little is known about factors associated with the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with an attempt at CPR for patients who experienced cardiopulmonary arrest. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data collected in 2 prospective cohort studies: the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT, 1989-1994) and the Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project (HELP, 1994). Setting Five teaching hospitals across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2505 seriously ill hospitalized patients and nonelectively admitted persons aged 80 years or older who experienced cardiopulmonary arrest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical records data on CPR efforts, DNR orders, disease severity, age, race, sex, length of stay, and survival; functional status and preferences concerning CPR obtained by interviews with patients or surrogates; and 2-month survival estimates provided by physicians. RESULTS: Five hundred fourteen study subjects (21 %) received CPR during their index hospitalization. Among them, 327 (63.6%) had CPR within 2 days of death and 93 (18.1 %) had resuscitation and survived their index hospitalization. Use of CPR was more likely in men (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.73), younger patients (OR per 10-year increase, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), African Americans (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.34), patients whose reported preferences were for CPR (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.91-3.55), who reported better quality of life (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.03), or who had higher physician estimates for 2-month survival (OR per 10% increase, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19). Rates varied significantly with geographic location and diagnosis; the adjusted OR for patients with congestive heart failure was 3.31 (95% CI, 2.12-5.15) compared with patients with acute respiratory failure or multiple organ system failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a resuscitation attempt is more likely when preferred by patients and when death is least expected. Further study is required to understand variation in use of CPR among sites and for patients with different diagnoses, race, sex, or age.
机译:背景:已经报道了住院患者的“不复活”(DNR)指令的流行病学,但有关使用心肺复苏(CPR)的相关因素知之甚少。目的:确定经历心肺骤停的患者进行心肺复苏术的相关因素。设计:对两项前瞻性队列研究收集的数据进行二次分析:了解预后和治疗结局及治疗风险的偏好研究(SUPPORT,1989-1994年)和住院老年纵向研究项目(HELP,1994年)。在全美设有5家教学医院。参加者:共有2505名重病住院患者和80岁以上的非自愿入院者,并经历了心肺骤停。主要观察指标:关于CPR努力,DNR次序,疾病严重程度,年龄,种族,性别,住院时间和生存情况的医疗记录数据。通过与患者或代理人的访谈获得的有关CPR的功能状态和偏好;和医生提供的2个月生存期估算。结果:514名研究对象(21%)在其指数住院期间接受了CPR。其中,有327例(63.6%)在死后两天内进行了心肺复苏,有93例(18.1%)进行了复苏并在其指数住院后幸存。男性(可能性比[OR]为1.39; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.12-1.73),年轻患者(每10年增加OR为0.90; 95%CI为0.84-0.96)更可能使用CPR ,非裔美国人(OR,1.76; 95%CI,1.33-2.34),其报告的患者首选CPR(OR,2.60; 95%CI,1.91-3.55),他们的生活质量更高(OR,1.49; 95) %CI(1.10-2.03),或医师对2个月生存率的估计更高(或每增加10%,OR为1.14; 95%CI,1.09-1.19)。发生率随地理位置和诊断的不同而有很大差异;与急性呼吸衰竭或多器官系统衰竭的患者相比,充血性心力衰竭患者的校正后OR为3.31(95%CI,2.12-5.15)。结论:我们的数据表明,当患者偏爱或最不希望死亡时,进行复苏的可能性更大。需要进一步的研究,以了解不同部位和诊断,种族,性别或年龄不同的患者使用CPR的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号