首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke.
【24h】

Distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke.

机译:区分出血性中风与缺血性中风。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor: In their Rational Clinical Examination article, Drs Runchey and McGee1 summarized the diagnostic accuracy of clinical findings and different stroke scores in distinguishing hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes. The pretest probability (prevalence) of hemorrhagic stroke in the selected studies was 24% (1528 of 6438 patients). A Siriraj score lower than -1 (likelihood ratio [LR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.37) or clinician overall impression that hemorrhage is unlikely (LR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.39) would decrease the probability of hemorrhage from 24% to 8%, reducing the diagnostic uncertainty but not lowering the likelihood of hemorrhage to a point at which further diagnostic evaluation by neuroimaging may be unnecessary.
机译:致编者:Runchey博士和McGee1在他们的Rational Clinical Examination文章中总结了临床发现和不同中风评分在区分出血性和缺血性中风方面的诊断准确性。所选研究中出血性中风的预测概率(患病率)为24%(6438例患者中的1528例)。 Siriraj得分低于-1(可能性比[LR]为0.29; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.23-0.37)或临床医生对出血的可能性不太大(LR为0.28; 95%CI为0.20-0.39)将出血的可能性从24%降低到8%,减少了诊断的不确定性,但又没有将出血的可能性降低到可能不需要通过神经影像进一步诊断评估的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号