首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke.
【24h】

Distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke.

机译:区分出血性中风从缺血性中风中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor: In their Rational Clinical Examination article, Drs Runchey and McGee1 summarized the diagnostic accuracy of clinical findings and different stroke scores in distinguishing hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes. The pretest probability (prevalence) of hemorrhagic stroke in the selected studies was 24% (1528 of 6438 patients). A Siriraj score lower than -1 (likelihood ratio [LR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.37) or clinician overall impression that hemorrhage is unlikely (LR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.39) would decrease the probability of hemorrhage from 24% to 8%, reducing the diagnostic uncertainty but not lowering the likelihood of hemorrhage to a point at which further diagnostic evaluation by neuroimaging may be unnecessary.
机译:对于编辑:在他们的理性临床检查文章中,普罗斯博士和McGee1总结了临床发现的诊断准确性和不同的中风评分,以区分出血性和缺血性卒中。 所选研究中出血性卒中的预测试概率(患病率)为24%(6438名患者的1528例)。 Siriraj得分低于-1(似然比[LR],0.29; 95%置信区间[CI],0.23-0.37)或临床医生的总体印象是出血不太可能(LR,0.28; 95%CI,0.20-0.39)将 将出血的概率从24%降至8%,降低了诊断的不确定性,但不降低出血的可能性,以至于可能不必要地进行了进一步诊断评估的点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号