首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Academic Medical Centers and Conflicts of Interest
【24h】

Academic Medical Centers and Conflicts of Interest

机译:学术医疗中心与利益冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: In their Special Communication, Dr Bren-nan and colleagues1 have proposed policies to eliminate the conflicts of interest that create bias in medical decisions and threaten scientific integrity. However, incomplete safeguards that ignore important contributors to bias will never be effective.This proposal focused solely on some conflicts of interest related to industry, ignoring other important factors that create bias. For example, scientific and educational meetings routinely require disclosure of conflicts related to industry but do not ask for disclosures related to clinical income or National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants, both of which are major factors for professional success and involve financial sums much greater than the small gifts that the authors strongly argue can influence the behavior of physicians and scientists. If small gifts can create bias, there may be an even greater effect from larger amounts of money from clinical income, NIH grants, advertisements in medical journals, or grants to academic medical centers (AMCs) and medical scientific societies. In addition, scientific misconduct may be ego-driven, rather than motivated by financial greed
机译:致编辑:布伦南博士及其同事在他们的特别通讯中提出了消除利益冲突的政策,这些利益冲突在医疗决策中造成偏见并威胁科学完整性。但是,忽视了偏见的重要贡献者的不完整保护措施将永远无效。该提案仅关注与行业相关的一些利益冲突,而忽略了其他可能导致偏见的重要因素。例如,科学和教育会议通常要求披露与行业有关的冲突,但不要求披露与临床收入或美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助有关的信息,这两者都是实现职业成功的主要因素,而且涉及的财务金额要大得多。作者强烈主张的小礼物可以影响医师和科学家的行为。如果小礼物可以造成偏见,则来自临床收入,NIH赠款,医学期刊上的广告或学术医疗中心(AMC)和医学科学学会的赠款会产生更大的影响。此外,科学不端行为可能是自我驱动的,而不是出于财务贪婪的动机

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号