首页> 外文期刊>JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery >Regional control of head and neck melanoma with selective neck dissection
【24h】

Regional control of head and neck melanoma with selective neck dissection

机译:选择性颈部清扫术对头颈部黑素瘤的区域控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

IMPORTANCE Historically, patients with cervical metastases from melanoma of the head and neck were treated with a radical neck dissection. This study evaluates the efficacy of limiting the extent of lymphadenectomy in this high-risk population.OBJECTIVES To determine whether limiting the extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with biopsy-proven melanoma has a negative effect on regional control. Our hypothesis was that performing a more limited lymphadenectomy does not have a negative impact on regional control.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective, single-cohort studywas performed using a prospectively collected database of patients with head and neck melanoma with histopathologically positive lymph nodes after modified radical (MRND) or selective neck dissection (SNDs) performed at a high-volume, academic, tertiary care center.INTERVENTIONS Lymphadenectomy was performed as clinically indicated.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary end pointswere regional recurrence and regional recurrence free survival. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted using multiple patient characteristics.RESULTS Forty-one patients underwent SND or MRND from 2001 through 2010. The median number of positive nodes was 1 (range, 1-16). Twenty-six patients (63%) received adjuvant radiation and 23 patients (56%) received adjuvant immunotherapy or chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 17 months (range, 1-116 months). Regional control was achieved in 29 patients (71%). Median regional recurrence-free survival was 21 months (range, 1-116 months). Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95%CI, 1.01-1.26), total number of nodes examined (HR, 1.05; 95%CI, 1.01-1.10), and number of sentinel lymph nodes examined (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.09) were all significantly associated with increased recurrence-free survival. Tumor depth, extracapsular spread, number of nodes positive, prior SLNB, extent of lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy were not significant.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Limiting the extent of lymphadenectomy with frequent use of adjuvant radiation therapy is effective in achieving regional control of head and neck melanoma with cervical metastases.
机译:重要事项从历史上看,头部和颈部黑色素瘤引起宫颈转移的患者均接受了根治性颈淋巴清扫术。这项研究评估了限制高危人群中淋巴结清扫术的效果。目的确定活检证实的黑色素瘤患者限制淋巴结清扫术的范围是否对区域控制有负面影响。我们的假设是,进行更有限的淋巴结清扫术不会对区域控制产生负面影响。设计,设置和参加者使用前瞻性收集的头颈部黑素瘤患者的组织病理学阳性淋巴结进行回顾性单队列研究主要研究结果和措施主要终点为区域复发和区域无复发生存率。在临床上,大量行学术性三级照护中心进行了改良根治术(MRND)或选择性颈清扫术(SNDs)。结果从2001年至2010年,对41例接受SND或MRND的患者进行了单变量和多变量分析。阳性淋巴结中位数为1(范围1-16)。 26例患者(63%)接受了辅助放疗,23例患者(56%)接受了辅助免疫疗法或化学疗法。中位随访时间为17个月(范围1-116个月)。 29名患者(71%)达到区域控制。中位区域无复发生存期为21个月(范围1-116个月)。年龄(危险比[HR],1.13; 95%CI,1.01-1.26),检查的淋巴结总数(HR,1.05; 95%CI,1.01-1.10),以及检查的前哨淋巴结数目(HR,1.45; 1.50; 1.01; 10。 95%CI(1.01-2.09)均与无复发生存率显着相关。肿瘤深度,包膜外扩散,淋巴结阳性,前哨淋巴结转移,淋巴结清扫的范围和辅助治疗均无统计学意义。结论和相关性频繁使用辅助放疗限制淋巴结清扫的范围可有效实现对头颈部的区域控制黑色素瘤伴宫颈转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号