首页> 外文期刊>JAMA internal medicine >The political polarization of physicians in the United States: An analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012
【24h】

The political polarization of physicians in the United States: An analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012

机译:美国医师的政治两极化:1991年至2012年竞选对联邦选举的贡献分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE Few current data are available regarding the political behavior of American physicians as the number of female physicians has increased and the number of solo practitioners has decreased. OBJECTIVE To analyze campaign contributions that physicians made from the 1991 to 1992 through the 2011 to 2012 election cycles to Republican and Democratic candidates in presidential and congressional races and to partisan organizations, including party committees and super political action committees (Super PACs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We explored partisan differences in physician contributions by sex, for-profit vs nonprofit practice setting, and specialty using multiple regression analysis.We studied the relation between the variation in the mean annual income across specialties and the mean percentage of physicians within each specialty contributing to Republicans. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Differences in contributions to Republicans and Democrats, for all physicians and for subgroups. RESULTS Between the 1991 to 1992 and the 2011 to 2012 election cycles, physician campaign contributions increased from $20 million to $189 million, and the percentage of active physicians contributing increased from 2.6%to 9.4%. Of physicians who contributed during the study period, the mean percentage contributing to Republicans was 57%for men and 31% for women. Since 1996, the percentage of physicians contributing to Republicans has decreased, to less than 50% in the 2007 to 2008 election cycle and again in the 2011 to 2012 election cycle. Contributions to Republicans in 2011 to 2012 were more prevalent among men vs women (52.3%vs 23.6%), physicians practicing in for-profit vs nonprofit organizations (53.2%vs 25.6%), and surgeons vs pediatricians (70.2%vs 22.1%). In 1991 to 1992, these contribution gaps were smaller: for sex, 54.5%vs 30.9%; for organizations, 54.2%vs 40.0%; and for specialty, 65.5%vs 32.7%. The percentage of physicians contributing to Republicans across specialties correlated 0.84 with the mean log earnings of each specialty; specialties with higher mean earnings had higher percentages of physicians contributing to Republicans. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Between 1991 and 2012, the political alignment of US physicians shifted from predominantly Republican toward the Democrats. The variables driving this change, including the increasing percentage of female physicians and the decreasing percentage of physicians in solo and small practices, are likely to drive further changes.
机译:重要信息随着女性医师人数的增加和独立医师人数的减少,关于美国医师的政治行为的最新数据很少。目的分析从1991年至1992年至2011年至2012年选举周期的医生对总统和国会竞选中的共和党和民主党候选人以及包括党委员会和超级政治行动委员会(Super PACs)在内的党派组织的竞选捐款。设计,场所和参与者我们使用多元回归分析探讨了按性别,营利性与非营利性实践环境以及专业划分的医生贡献的党派差异。我们研究了各专业的平均年收入变化与专业的平均百分比之间的关系。每个专业领域的医生都为共和党做出了贡献。主要成果和措施所有医师和亚组对共和党人和民主党人的贡献差异。结果在1991年至1992年以及2011年至2012年的选举周期中,医生竞选活动的捐款从2000万美元增加到1.89亿美元,活跃的医生捐款百分比从2.6%增加到9.4%。在研究期间做出贡献的医生中,对共和党做出贡献的平均百分比是男性为57%,女性为31%。自1996年以来,对共和党人做出贡献的医生所占比例下降了,在2007年至2008年的选举周期以及2011年至2012年的选举周期中,不足50%。 2011年至2012年,共和党人的贡献在男性与女性中更为普遍(52.3%vs 23.6%),在营利性组织与非营利组织中执业的医师(53.2%vs 25.6%),以及外科医生与儿科医生的比例(70.2%vs 22.1%) 。在1991年至1992年间,这些贡献差距较小:性别比例为54.5%,而女性比例为30.9%;对于组织而言,为54.2%,而同期为40.0%;特种产品则为65.5%,而32.7%。在各专业中为共和党人做出贡献的医师百分比与每个专业的平均对数收入相关联为0.84;平均收入较高的专业对共和党人的贡献率较高。结论与相关性1991年至2012年间,美国医生的政治结盟从主要是共和党转向了民主党。推动这一变化的变量,包括女医生比例的增加和单人和小型诊所医生比例的降低,都可能推动进一步的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号