首页> 外文期刊>JAMA dermatology >Differences in treatment of Spitz nevi and atypical Spitz tumors in pediatric patients among dermatologists and plastic surgeons
【24h】

Differences in treatment of Spitz nevi and atypical Spitz tumors in pediatric patients among dermatologists and plastic surgeons

机译:皮肤科医生和整形外科医生对小儿Spitz痣和非典型Spitz肿瘤的治疗差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

No clear consensus exists for the management of Spitz nevi (SNs) or atypical Spitz tumors (ASTs), particularly in the pe-diatric population. Some dermatologists recommend the removal of all suspected Spitz tumors in children, whereas others perform partial biopsy or monitor clinically. Methods | We designed a 10-question survey that was sent to plastic surgeons and dermatologists practicing in the United States (eAppendix in Supplement). The online questionnaire was distributed to 1144 physicians (578 dermatologists and 566 plastic surgeons). Among the 230 physicians who completed the survey, 136 were dermatologists (59%), and 94 were plastic surgeons (41%). This study was approved by the Washington University (St Louis, Missouri) institutional review board. A 2-sided Z test for comparison of 2 proportions was used to compare responses. Data were collected from July 2010 to February 2011.
机译:对于Spitz nevi(SN)或非典型的Spitz肿瘤(AST)的治疗尚无明确共识,尤其是在小儿科人群中。一些皮肤科医生建议去除儿童中所有疑似的斯皮茨肿瘤,而其他皮肤科医生建议进行部分活检或临床监测。方法我们设计了一个十个问题的调查问卷,发送给在美国执业的整形外科医生和皮肤科医生(附录中的eAppendix)。在线问卷已分发给1144位医生(578位皮肤科医生和566位整形外科医生)。在完成调查的230位医生中,皮肤科医生为136位(59%),整形外科医生为94位(41%)。该研究得到华盛顿大学(密苏里州圣路易斯)机构审查委员会的批准。使用2面Z检验比较2个比例来比较反应。数据收集时间为2010年7月至2011年2月。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号