...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Drug-Induced QT/QTc Interval Shortening: Lessons from Drug-Induced QT/QTc Prolongation
【24h】

Drug-Induced QT/QTc Interval Shortening: Lessons from Drug-Induced QT/QTc Prolongation

机译:药物诱导的QT / QTc间隔缩短:药物诱导的QT / QTc延长的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The review discusses safety implications of drugs found to shorten the QT/QTc interval. It uses parallels with drug-induced QT/QTc prolongation. It summarizes the evidence that increases in repolarization heterogeneity are likely more important for arrhythmia induction and maintenance than the absolute changes in the QT/QTc duration. The review further compares the direct evidence of proarrhythmia caused by QT-prolonging and -shortening drugs. At present, there is little proof of QT-shortening drugs causing ventricular fibrillation in more than rare isolated instances. Comparisons of the incidence of the congenital syndromes show that short QT syndrome is much rarer than long QT syndrome, similar to the findings of short QT intervals compared with long QT intervals in the general population. Nevertheless, potential concerns come from experimental drugs developed to increase the current of potassium-rectifying channels. Some of these drugs were found to cause ventricular fibrillation in isolated hearts. Still, population exposure to drug-induced QT shortening is likely substantially lower compared with QT prolongation, especially if considering that most of the processes that decrease the so-called repolarization reserve are associated with QT prolongation. Finally, the review lists reasons why purely theoretical concepts of pharmaceutical risk cannot be used to develop regulatory guidance and concludes that at present, no additional tests and/or general acceptance restrictions are needed for the approval of QT-shortening drugs.
机译:该评论讨论了发现缩短QT / QTc间隔的药物的安全性含义。它与药物诱导的QT / QTc延长相似。它总结了证据,即重新极化异质性的增加对心律失常的诱导和维持可能比QT / QTc持续时间的绝对变化更重要。该评价进一步比较了延长和缩短QT药物引起的心律失常的直接证据。目前,很少有证据表明缩短QT的药物能导致心室颤动的情况比罕见的孤立病例更多。先天性综合征发病率的比较表明,短QT综合征比长QT综合征少得多,这与一般人群中长QT间隔相比长QT间隔的发现相似。然而,潜在的担忧来自为增加钾整流通道电流而开发的实验药物。发现这些药物中的一些在离体心脏中引起心室纤颤。尽管如此,与QT延长相比,人群暴露于药物引起的QT缩短的可能性可能要低得多,尤其是考虑到降低所谓的重新极化储备的大多数过程都与QT延长相关时。最后,该评论列出了为什么不能仅使用理论上的药物风险概念来制定监管指南的原因,并得出结论,目前,批准QT缩短药物不需要其他测试和/或一般接受限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号