首页> 外文期刊>Drying technology: An International Journal >Comparative Evaluation of Hot-Air and Superheated-Steam Impinging Stream Drying as Novel Alternatives for Paddy Drying
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Hot-Air and Superheated-Steam Impinging Stream Drying as Novel Alternatives for Paddy Drying

机译:热风和过热蒸汽撞击流干燥作为稻谷干燥的新选择的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An investigation was conducted on impinging stream drying of moist paddy using hot air and superheated steam as the drying media. Drying experiments were divided into two parts: namely, one-pass and two-pass drying. The volumetric water evaporation rate, volumetric heat transfer coefficient, and specific energy consumption of the drying system at various conditions were assessed; in the case of superheated-steam drying, the effect of steam recycle was also assessed. The quality of dried paddy was evaluated in terms of color, head rice yield, and degree of starch gelatinization. In the case of one-pass drying, an increase in the drying temperature led to a significant increase in the volumetric water evaporation rate and volumetric heat transfer coefficient. On the other hand, in the case of two-pass drying, an increase in the drying temperature led to a significant decrease in the volumetric heat transfer coefficient; the volumetric water evaporation rate was not significantly affected, however. The specific energy consumption decreased with an increase in the drying temperature. At the same temperature, using superheated steam as the drying medium led to lower specific energy consumption; higher level of steam recycle also led to more energy conservation. The color of the dried paddy was not affected by the change in the drying temperature; superheated-steam-dried paddy was redder and more yellow than the hot-air-dried paddy. An increase in the drying temperature led to decreased percentage of head rice yield. Superheated-steam drying helped enhance the level of starch gelatinization in comparison with hot-air drying at the same temperature. Nevertheless, drying at the highest tested temperature led to a lower level of starch gelatinization.
机译:使用热空气和过热蒸汽作为干燥介质,对湿稻进行流式干燥研究。干燥实验分为两部分:一遍干燥和两遍干燥。评估了干燥系统在各种条件下的体积水蒸发速率,体积传热系数和比能耗;在过热蒸汽干燥的情况下,还评估了蒸汽循环的效果。根据颜色,糙米产量和淀粉糊化程度评估稻谷的质量。在单程干燥的情况下,干燥温度的升高导致体积水蒸发速率和体积传热系数的显着提高。另一方面,在两次通过干燥的情况下,干燥温度的升高导致体积传热系数的显着降低;因此,在两次通过干燥的情况下,传热系数显着降低。然而,体积水蒸发速率没有受到显着影响。比能量消耗随着干燥温度的升高而降低。在相同温度下,使用过热蒸汽作为干燥介质可降低单位能耗。更高水平的蒸汽再循环还导致更多的节能。干燥稻谷的颜色不受干燥温度变化的影响。过热蒸汽干燥的稻米比热风干燥的稻米更红,更黄。干燥温度的升高导致原稻产量的百分比降低。与在相同温度下进行热风干燥相比,过热蒸汽干燥有助于提高淀粉糊化水平。然而,在最高测试温度下干燥导致较低的淀粉糊化水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号