首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Chronic hepatitis B management based on standard guidelines in community primary care and specialty clinics
【24h】

Chronic hepatitis B management based on standard guidelines in community primary care and specialty clinics

机译:根据社区初级保健和专科诊所的标准指南进行的慢性乙肝管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and Aims: Prior studies have underlined the need for increased screening and awareness of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), especially in certain high-risk populations. However, few studies have examined the patterns of evaluation and management of CHB between primary care physicians (PCP) and specialists according to commonly-used professional guidelines. Our goal was to examine whether necessary laboratory parameters used to determine disease status and eligibility for antiviral therapy were performed by PCPs and specialists. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 253 treatment-na?ve CHB patients who were evaluated by PCP only (n = 63) or by specialists (n = 190) for CHB at a community multispecialty medical center between March 2007 and June 2009. Criteria for CHB management and treatment eligibility were based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2007 guideline and the US Panel 2006 algorithm. Required parameters for optimal evaluation for CHB included hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV DNA, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Preferred antiviral agents for CHB included pegylated interferon, adefovir, and entecavir. Results: The majority of patients were Asians (90 %) and male (54 %) with a mean age of 43 ± 11.6 years. Compared to PCPs, specialists were more likely to order laboratory testing for ALT (94 vs. 86 %, P = 0.05), HBeAg (67 vs. 41 %, P < 0.0001) and HBV DNA (83 vs. 52 %, P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients having all three laboratory parameters was significantly higher among those evaluated by specialists compared to PCP (62 vs. 33 %, P < 0.0001). A total of 55 patients were initiated on antiviral treatment (n = 47 by specialists and n = 6 by PCPs). Lamivudine was prescribed more often by PCPs than specialists (33 vs. 2 %, P = 0.05). Preferred agents were used 96 % of the time by specialists compared to 67 % of those treated by PCPs (P = 0.05). Conclusion: Patients evaluated by specialists for CHB are more likely to undergo more complete laboratory evaluation and, if eligible, are also more likely to be treated with preferred longer-term agents for CHB compared to those evaluated by PCPs only. A collaborative model of care involving both PCP and specialists may further optimize management of patients with CHB.
机译:背景和目的:先前的研究强调需要对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)进行更多的筛查和认识,尤其是在某些高风险人群中。但是,很少有研究根据普遍使用的专业指南检查初级保健医师(PCP)和专家之间的CHB评估和管理模式。我们的目标是检查PCP和专家是否进行了必要的实验室参数来确定疾病状态和抗病毒治疗的资格。方法:我们对2007年3月至2009年6月间在社区多专科医疗中心对253名初治CHB患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者仅由PCP(n = 63)或由专家(n = 190)进行了CHB评估。 CHB管理和治疗资格的标准基于美国肝病研究协会2007指南和US Panel 2006算法。对CHB进行最佳评估所需的参数包括乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg),HBV DNA和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)。 CHB的首选抗病毒药物包括聚乙二醇化干扰素,阿德福韦和恩替卡韦。结果:大多数患者为亚洲人(90%)和男性(54%),平均年龄为43±11.6岁。与PCP相比,专家更有可能订购实验室检测ALT(94%vs. 86%,P = 0.05),HBeAg(67%vs. 41%,P <0.0001)和HBV DNA(83 vs. 52%,P <0.0001)。 0.0001)。与PCP相比,由专家评估的具有所有三个实验室参数的患者比例显着更高(62%对33%,P <0.0001)。总共有55名患者开始接受抗病毒治疗(专家= 47例,PCP专家= 6例)。 PCP医师比专家更常开出拉米夫定(33比2%,P = 0.05)。专家在96%的时间中使用了首选药剂,而PCP治疗者中使用了67%(P = 0.05)。结论:与仅由PCP评估的患者相比,由CHB专家评估的患者更有可能接受更全面的实验室评估,并且如果符合条件,则也更有可能接受首选的CHB长期药物治疗。 PCP和专家共同参与的协作式护理模式可以进一步优化CHB患者的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号