...
首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >The result of world powers in WTO: A cheap-talk game under different communication protocols
【24h】

The result of world powers in WTO: A cheap-talk game under different communication protocols

机译:世界大国在WTO中的结果:不同通讯协议下的廉价对话游戏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Official reports and case studies reveal that China experienced different means of communication with the world powers since it joined the World Trade Organization in 2001. In the first five years, China had public communication with both the United States and the European Union under the Transitional Review Mechanism. In 2006 a new means of communication, the China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue, started to take effect. Reports show that the new mechanism has advanced the China-US relationship positively and productively. The difference between the two means of communication stimulates our study. We adopt a game theory model to examine the impact of different communication protocols on China's incentives to reveal information. We analyze a cheap-talk game between an informed agent and two uninformed principals who coordinate actions under two communication protocols: public and private communication. First, all equilibria under both means of communication are characterized. Information precision of the agent's equilibrium messages decreases with the principals' preference biases. Second, under private communication the agent communicates more informatively with one principal if she in effect reveals little information to the other. Under private communication there exists an informative equilibrium with asymmetric levels of information precision even when all equilibria under public communication are uninformative.
机译:官方报告和案例研究表明,自2001年加入世界贸易组织以来,中国与世界大国的交流方式有所不同。在过渡性审查的最初五年中,中国与美国和欧盟进行了公众交流机制。 2006年,一种新的交流方式即中美战略与经济对话开始生效。有报道显示,新机制积极,有效地推动了中美关系的发展。两种交流方式之间的差异刺激了我们的研究。我们采用博弈论模型来研究不同通信协议对中国信息披露激励措施的影响。我们分析了一个知情的代理人和两个不知情的委托人之间的廉价对话游戏,后者根据两种通信协议(公共和私人通信)协调行动。首先,表征两种交流方式下的所有平衡。代理人均衡信息的信息精度随着委托人的偏好偏差而降低。其次,在私人沟通下,如果代理实际上没有向另一名委托人透露任何信息,则其与另一名委托人进行更多的信息交流。在私人交流下,即使公共交流下的所有均衡都是非信息性的,也存在信息精确度不对称的信息均衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号