首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >How does separating government regulatory and operational control of public hospitals matter to healthcare supply?
【24h】

How does separating government regulatory and operational control of public hospitals matter to healthcare supply?

机译:将政府对公立医院的监管和运营控制分开对医疗保健供应有何影响?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper evaluates the effect of regulatory reform separating the operational control and regulatory oversight of public hospitals in China. Using city-level data and a difference-in-difference (DID) model, this paper estimates the changes in healthcare supply in response to the regulatory reform. Based on the DID estimates, in Weifang between 2006 and 2008, the reform led to a 39.3% increase in the number of doctors per 10,000 residents and 40.1% increase in the number of health workers per 10,000 residents. Similarly, in Suzhou between 2005 and 2008 the reform led to increases of 60.5%, 30.8% and 36.6% for hospital beds, doctors and health workers per 10,000 people, respectively. Moreover, the magnitude of this impact appears to increase over time. Furthermore, the effect of the reform is consistent regardless of whether the separation reform takes place inside or outside the government. These findings lead us to conclude that the government should focus only on the regulation of healthcare markets, while leaving hospital operation to the free market.
机译:本文评估了将中国公立医院的运营控制与监管监督分开的监管改革的效果。本文使用城市级数据和差异差异(DID)模型,估算了根据监管改革而产生的医疗保健供应变化。根据DID的估计,2006年至2008年间,潍坊的改革使每10,000居民的医生人数增加了39.3%,每10,000居民的卫生工作者人数增加了40.1%。同样,在2005年至2008年期间,苏州的改革导致每10,000人中的病床,医生和卫生工作者的增长率分别为60.5%,30.8%和36.6%。而且,这种影响的程度似乎随着时间而增加。此外,无论分拆改革是在政府内部还是外部进行,改革的效果都是一致的。这些发现使我们得出结论,政府应只关注医疗市场的监管,而将医院运营留给自由市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号