...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Vibration perception threshold as a measure of distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: results from the DCCT/EDIC study.
【24h】

Vibration perception threshold as a measure of distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: results from the DCCT/EDIC study.

机译:振动知觉阈值作为1型糖尿病远端对称性周围神经病变的量度:DCCT / EDIC研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To describe the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of vibration perception threshold (VPT) testing in subjects with type 1 diabetes relative to gold standard assessments of peripheral neuropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: VPT was determined in 1,177 adults with type 1 diabetes 13-14 years after participating in a study of intensive (INT) versus conventional (CONV) diabetes treatment. Abnormal VPT was defined by values exceeding 2.5 SD above age-specific normal values. Signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy were assessed and electrodiagnostic studies were performed to establish definite clinical neuropathy, abnormal nerve conduction, and confirmed clinical neuropathy (the presence of both definite clinical neuropathy and abnormal nerve conduction). RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of subjects had definite clinical neuropathy, 61% had abnormal nerve conduction, and 30% had confirmed clinical neuropathy. Abnormal VPT was more common among former CONV than among INT subjects (64 vs. 57%, P < 0.05) and was associated with older age. VPT was a sensitive measure of confirmed clinical neuropathy (87%) and of definite clinical neuropathy (80%) and a specific measure of abnormal nerve conduction (62%). Higher VPT cut points improved test sensitivity and lower cut points improved specificity. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.71-0.83 and were higher for older than for younger subjects and highest for those with confirmed clinical neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: VPT was a sensitive measure of peripheral neuropathy. Future researchers may choose to select VPT cut points for defining abnormality based on the population studied and clinical outcome of interest.
机译:目的:描述相对于周围神经病的金标准评估,在1型糖尿病患者中振动知觉阈值(VPT)测试的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。研究设计和方法:在参加强化(INT)与常规(CONV)糖尿病治疗研究后的13至14岁的1177名1型糖尿病成年人中确定了VPT。 VPT异常定义为高于特定年龄的正常值超过2.5 SD的值。评估周围神经病变的体征和症状,并进行电诊断研究以建立明确的临床神经病变,异常的神经传导并确认临床神经病变(既存在明确的临床神经病变又存在异常的神经传导)。结果:37%的受试者患有明确的临床神经病,61%的神经传导异常,30%的临床神经病得到确认。在前CONV患者中,VPT异常比在INT患者中更为常见(64比57%,P <0.05),并且与年龄较大有关。 VPT是确定的临床神经病变(87%)和确定的临床神经病变(80%)以及敏感的神经传导异常(62%)的敏感指标。更高的VPT切割点提高了测试灵敏度,而更低的切割点则提高了特异性。受试者工作特征曲线下的面积范围为0.71-0.83,年龄较大的受试者要比年轻的受试者高,对于已确认临床神经病的受试者最高。结论:VPT是周围神经病变的敏感指标。未来的研究人员可能会根据研究的人群和感兴趣的临床结果选择选择VPT切点来定义异常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号