...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Pharmacokinetics of 125I-labeled insulin glargine (HOE 901) in healthy men: comparison with NPH insulin and the influence of different subcutaneous injection sites.
【24h】

Pharmacokinetics of 125I-labeled insulin glargine (HOE 901) in healthy men: comparison with NPH insulin and the influence of different subcutaneous injection sites.

机译:125 I标记的甘精胰岛素(HOE 901)在健康男性中的药代动力学:与NPH胰岛素的比较以及不同皮下注射部位的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the subcutaneous absorption rates and the appearance in plasma of 3 formulations of the long-acting human insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE 901) differing only in zinc content (15, 30, and 80 microg/ml). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted 2 studies. Study 1 compared the subcutaneous abdominal injection of 0.15 U/kg of 125I-labeled insulin glargine[15], insulin glargine[80], NPH insulin, and placebo. In study 2, 0.2 U/kg of insulin glargine[30] was injected into the arm, leg, and abdominal regions. Both studies had a randomized crossover design; each enrolled 12 healthy men, aged 18-50 years. RESULTS: In study 1, the time in hours for 25% of the administered radioactivity to disappear after bolus subcutaneous injection (T75%) for NPH insulin indicated a significantly faster absorption rate compared with the 2 insulin glargine formulations (3.2 vs. 8.8 and 11.0 h, respectively P < 0.0001). Mean residual radioactivity with NPH insulin was also significantly lower at 24 h (21.9 vs. 43.8 and 52.2%, P < 0.0001). The calculated plasma exogenous insulin concentrations after NPH insulin were substantially higher than those with insulin glargine, reaching a peak within the first 6 h after administration before declining. Insulin glargine, however, did not exhibit a distinct peak. Weighted average plasma glucose concentration between 0 and 6 h was significantly lower after NPH compared with insulin glargine (P < 0.001). In study 2, there were no significant differences in the absorption characteristics of insulin glargine between the 3 injection sites (T75% = 11.9, 15.3, and 13.2 h for arm, leg, and abdomen, respectively) or in residual radioactivity at 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous absorption of insulin glargine is delayed compared with NPH insulin. There is little or no difference in the absorption rate of insulin glargine between the main subcutaneous injection sites.
机译:目的:确定三种长效人胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素(HOE 901)的三种制剂的皮下吸收速率和在血浆中的外观,这些制剂的锌含量(15、30和80微克/毫升)不同。研究设计和方法:我们进行了2次研究。研究1比较了皮下腹部注射0.15 U / kg 125I标记的甘精胰岛素[15],甘精胰岛素[80],NPH胰岛素和安慰剂的情况。在研究2中,将0.2 U / kg的甘精胰岛素[30]注射到手臂,腿部和腹部。两项研究均采用随机交叉设计。每个研究对象招募了12位年龄在18-50岁之间的健康男性。结果:在研究1中,NPH胰岛素大剂量皮下注射(T75%)后25%的放射活性消失的时间表示,与2种甘精胰岛素制剂相比,吸收速率明显加快(3.2对8.8和11.0) h分别为P <0.0001)。 NPH胰岛素的平均残留放射​​性在24小时时也显着降低(21.9比43.8和52.2%,P <0.0001)。 NPH胰岛素后计算的血浆外源性胰岛素浓度明显高于甘精胰岛素,在给药后前6小时内达到峰值,然后下降。然而,甘精胰岛素没有表现出明显的峰。与甘精胰岛素相比,NPH后0至6 h之间的加权平均血浆葡萄糖浓度显着降低(P <0.001)。在研究2中,在3个注射部位之间甘精胰岛素的吸收特性(手臂,腿和腹部分别为T75%= 11.9、15.3和13.2 h)或24小时的残留放射性没有显着差异。结论:与NPH胰岛素相比,甘精胰岛素的皮下吸收延迟。在主要的皮下注射部位之间,甘精胰岛素的吸收率几乎没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号