...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Response to Alleyn etal. Comparison of longitudinal point-of-care and high-performance liquid chromatography HbA1c measurements in a multi-centre trial
【24h】

Response to Alleyn etal. Comparison of longitudinal point-of-care and high-performance liquid chromatography HbA1c measurements in a multi-centre trial

机译:对Alleyn等人的回应。多中心试验中纵向护理点和高效液相色谱HbA1c测量值的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with interest the paper by Alleyn et al. [1] and, whilst supporting the view that standardization of HbA_(1c) estimation is required for research purposes, believe this would also be of benefit in clinical practice. In keeping with other studies, the authors set < 5.5 mmol/mol (0.5%) HbA_(1c) as their cut-off for an acceptable difference when comparing anaytical methods. However, in everyday practice, this difference, viewed in these times of performance-related funding, may have a number of clinical and financial implications.
机译:我们感兴趣地阅读了Alleyn等人的论文。 [1],尽管支持HbA_(1c)估计值需要进行标准化以用于研究目的的观点,但认为这也将在临床实践中受益。与其他研究一致的是,当比较分析方法时,作者将HbA_(1c)的阈值设置为<5.5 mmol / mol(0.5%),以得到可接受的差异。但是,在日常实践中,这种在绩效相关资金时代所看到的差异可能会产生许多临床和财务影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号