...
首页> 外文期刊>Developing world bioethics >Promoting Equity in Health Through Research and Understanding
【24h】

Promoting Equity in Health Through Research and Understanding

机译:通过研究和理解促进健康公平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Developing strategies to reduce inequities in health requires an understanding of how inequities occur, determining the salient factors in their production, and deciding which ones are most amenable to change. The recognition of several principles regarding the manifestations and genesis of inequities can help to decide on strategies. In making decisions, it is important to consider whether the aim is to reduce disparities in the occurrence of ill health or to reduce disparities in the severity (including co-morbidity, disability, dysfunction and fatality) of ill health. Evidence shows that the major impact on equity of health services, particularly regarding their potential to reduce severity, is attributable to the strength of primary care resources and services in communities and countries. Virtually every influence on the genesis of inequities is determined by the political context in which policy is made. The issue of health services is not different in this regard from other types of strategies. There is no longer any doubt about the pervasive influence of social factors on health. Almost two centuries of descriptive research provides convincing evidence of associations between social structures and relationships and health status in all countries and in all societies; if there is anything new from more recent research, it is that the association is not limited to differences between the lowest social strata and other social strata. Rather, the association is noted throughout the social spectrum. That is, there is a social gradient in health such that, for many if not most manifestations of ill health, the lower the social stratum, the worse the health. The challenge for the future is to understand why this is the case, to create a consensus that these inequalities are unnecessary and unacceptable, and to devise strategies that are both effective and possible. This paper will focus on the first of these aims, in a context that facilitates attention to the second and third aims.
机译:制定减少健康不平等的策略,需要了解不平等的发生方式,确定其不平等产生的显着因素,并确定最容易改变的因素。对不平等的表现形式和起源的几个原则的认识可以帮助决定策略。在做出决定时,重要的是要考虑目标是减少疾病状况发生方面的差异,还是减少疾病状况严重程度(包括合并症,残疾,功能障碍和死亡)方面的差异。有证据表明,对卫生服务公平性的重大影响,特别是在降低严重性方面的潜力方面,主要归因于社区和国家初级保健资源和服务的实力。实际上,对不平等起源的所有影响都取决于制定政策的政治环境。在这方面,卫生服务的问题与其他类型的战略没有什么不同。人们不再怀疑社会因素对健康的普遍影响。近两个世纪的描述性研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明所有国家和所有社会的社会结构与人际关系与健康状况之间存在关联;如果最近的研究有什么新发现,那就是这种关联不仅限于最低社会阶层与其他社会阶层之间的差异。而是在整个社会范围内都注意到了这种关联。也就是说,健康状况存在社会梯度,因此,对于许多(即使不是大多数)健康状况不佳的疾病,社会阶层越低,健康状况越差。未来的挑战是理解为什么会这样,达成共识,认为这些不平等是不必要和不可接受的,并制定有效且可能的策略。本文将在促进关注第二和第三目标的背景下,重点关注这些目标中的第一个。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号