首页> 外文期刊>Dalton transactions: An international journal of inorganic chemistry >Agostic or not? Detailed Density Functional Theory studies of the compounds [LRh(CO)Cl], [LRh(COD)Cl] and [LRhCl] (L = cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene, COD = cyclooctadiene)
【24h】

Agostic or not? Detailed Density Functional Theory studies of the compounds [LRh(CO)Cl], [LRh(COD)Cl] and [LRhCl] (L = cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene, COD = cyclooctadiene)

机译:激进与否?化合物[LRh(CO)Cl],[LRh(COD)Cl]和[LRhCl]的详细密度泛函理论研究(L =环状(烷基)(氨基)碳烯,COD =环辛二烯)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Detailed Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies were conducted on the rhodium compounds [LRh(CO)Cl] (1), [LRhCl] (2) and [LRh(COD)Cl] (3) (L = cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene, CAAC; COD = cyclooctadiene). Particular attention was paid to the two cyclohexyl hydrogens of the CAAC which are in close proximity to the metal centre. Bader and NBO analyses confirmed an agostic interaction, and NBO analysis revealed that in the case of 1, the Rh-CO antibonding orbital acts as an acceptor. Removal of the CO ligand (2) did not significantly change the agostic interaction of the two cyclohexyl hydrogens or the geometry of the cyclohexyl ligand. Replacement of the 2e- donor CO with the 4e - donor COD gives a different picture. Although both cyclohexyl hydrogens are still in close proximity to the metal centre, neither are agostically bound to it. In fact, the very weak interaction of one of them is of the same order as that present in the Cl-H bond. We thus suggest a revised description of agostic bonding.
机译:对铑化合物[LRh(CO)Cl](1),[LRhCl](2)和[LRh(COD)Cl](3)进行了详细的密度泛函理论(DFT)研究(L =环状(烷基)(氨基)碳烯,CAAC; COD =环辛二烯)。特别注意了CAAC的两个靠近金属中心的环己基氢。 Bader和NBO分析证实了一种可怕的相互作用,NBO分析表明,在1的情况下,Rh-CO反键轨道充当受体。除去CO配体(2)并没有显着改变两个环己基氢的原子间相互作用或环己基配体的几何形状。用4e-供体COD替换2e-供体CO的情况不同。尽管两个环己基氢原子仍紧邻金属中心,但它们都没有被束缚。实际上,它们之一的非常弱的相互作用与Cl-H键中存在的相互作用具有相同的顺序。因此,我们建议修改后的描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号