...
首页> 外文期刊>Houston Journal of Mathematics >NOT EVERY CO-EXISTENTIAL MAP IS CONFLUENT
【24h】

NOT EVERY CO-EXISTENTIAL MAP IS CONFLUENT

机译:并非每个共存地图都足够

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A continuous surjection between compacta is co-existential if it is the second of two maps whose composition is a standard ultracopower projection. Co-existential maps are always weakly confluent, and are even monotone when the range space is locally connected; so it is a natural question to ask whether they are always confluent. Here we give a negative answer. This is an interesting question, mainly because of the fact that most theorems about confluent maps have parallel versions for co-existential maps—notably, both kinds of maps preserve hereditary indecomposability. Where the known parallels break down is in the question of chainability. It is a celebrated open problem whether confluent maps preserve chainability, or even being a pseudo-arc; however, as has recently been shown [7], co-existential maps do indeed preserve both these properties.
机译:如果Compacta是两个图的第二张,其组成是一个标准的超功率投影,则连续不断地存在共生。共存映射始终是弱融合的,并且当范围空间在本地连接时甚至是单调的;因此,询问它们是否始终融合是一个自然的问题。在这里,我们给出一个否定的答案。这是一个有趣的问题,主要是因为大多数关于合流图的定理都具有共存图的并行版本,尤其是两种图都保留了遗传不可分解性。已知的并行故障所在的地方是可链接性问题。融合地图是否保持可链接性,甚至是伪弧,这是一个著名的开放问题。然而,正如最近显示的[7],共存映射确实保留了这两个属性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号