首页> 外文期刊>Human and Experimental Toxicology >Relation between blood- and urine-amphetamine concentrations in impaired drivers as influenced by urinary pH and creatinine.
【24h】

Relation between blood- and urine-amphetamine concentrations in impaired drivers as influenced by urinary pH and creatinine.

机译:受尿液pH和肌酐影响的驾驶员中血液和尿液中的苯异丙胺浓度之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Amphetamine undergoes extensive renal excretion and significant amounts are present in urine as the unchanged parent drug. This prompted us to investigate whether a quantitative relationship existed between blood and urine concentrations of amphetamine in the body fluids of drug-impaired drivers apprehended in Sweden, where this stimulant is the major drug of abuse. The relationship between blood and urine concentrations of amphetamine was determined by multivariate analysis with urinary pH and creatinine as predictor variables. Amphetamine was determined in blood and urine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with deuterium-labelled internal standards. The concentration of amphetamine in urine was about 200 times greater than the concentration in blood; the mean and median urine/blood ratios were 214 and 160, respectively, with large individual variations. The Pearson correlation coefficient between urine (y) and blood (x) amphetamine was r = 0.53, n = 48, which was statistically highly significant(P < 0.001), although the residual standard deviation (SD) was large (+/- 181 mg/L). The correlation coefficient increased (r = 0.60) when the concentration of amphetamine in urine was normalized for dilution by dividing with the creatinine content. When urinary pH and creatinine were both included as predictor variables, the correlation coefficient was even higher (r = 0.69), now explaining 48% (r2 = 0.48) of the variation in urine-amphetamine concentration. However, the partial regression coefficient for creatinine (53 +/- 28.7) was not statistically significant (t = 1.85, P > 0.05), whereas the corresponding regression coefficient for pH was highly significant and had a negative sign (-102 +/- 32.6, t= -3.12, P < 0.005). Other factors could impact on the urine-blood amphetamine relationship, such as route of administration, pattern of voiding and time elapsed after use of the drug.
机译:苯丙胺经历广泛的肾脏排泄,尿液中存在大量未改变的母体药物。这促使我们调查瑞典逮捕的毒品受损驾驶员的体液中苯丙胺的血液和尿液浓度之间是否存在定量关系,瑞典是这种兴奋剂是主要的滥用药物。通过以尿液pH和肌酐为预测变量的多变量分析,确定了苯丙胺血液和尿液浓度之间的关系。用氘标记内标通过气相色谱-质谱法测定血液和尿液中的苯丙胺。尿液中的苯丙胺浓度比血液中的浓度高约200倍。平均和中位数的尿/血比分别为214和160,个体差异较大。尿(y)和血液(x)苯丙胺之间的Pearson相关系数为r = 0.53,n = 48,尽管残留标准偏差(SD)大(+/- 181),但在统计学上具有显着性意义(P <0.001)。毫克/升)。通过除以肌酐含量将尿液中的苯丙胺浓度标准化以进行稀释时,相关系数增加(r = 0.60)。当将尿液pH和肌酐都作为预测变量时,相关系数甚至更高(r = 0.69),现在可以解释48%(r2 = 0.48)的尿中苯丙胺浓度的变化。然而,肌酐的部分回归系数(53 +/- 28.7)在统计学上不显着(t = 1.85,P> 0.05),而pH的相应回归系数却非常显着且具有负号(-102 +/-)。 32.6,t = -3.12,P <0.005)。其他因素可能会影响尿血苯丙胺的关系,例如给药途径,排尿方式和使用药物后经过的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号