首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension research: Official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension >Controlled release nifedipine and valsartan combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension: the adalat CR and valsartan cost-effectiveness combination (ADVANCE-combi) study.
【24h】

Controlled release nifedipine and valsartan combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension: the adalat CR and valsartan cost-effectiveness combination (ADVANCE-combi) study.

机译:控释硝苯地平和缬沙坦联合治疗原发性高血压的患者:adalat CR和缬沙坦的成本效益联合研究(ADVANCE-combi)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of two calcium channel blocker-based combination therapies with an angiotensin receptor blocker in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. A 16-week, double-blind, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of controlled release nifedipine (nifedipine CR) plus valsartan vs. that of amlodipine plus valsartan. The primary endpoint was the target blood pressure achievement rate. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to nifedipine CR-based or amlodipine-based treatment groups. Patients were examined every 4 weeks to determine whether the blood pressure had reached the target level. When the target level was not achieved, the drug regimen was changed; when the target blood pressure was achieved, the same study medication was continued. A total of 505 patients were enrolled in the study (nifedipine CR group: 245 cases; amlodipine group: 260 cases). After 16 weeks of treatment, blood pressure was significantly reduced in both groups, but to a larger extent in the nifedipine CR group than in the amlodipine group (p < 0.01). The target blood pressure achievement rate was also significantly higher in the nifedipine CR group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of drug-related adverse events between the groups. These results indicate that the nifedipine CR-based combination therapy was superior to the amlodipine-based therapy for decreasing blood pressure and achieving the target blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension.
机译:本研究旨在比较两种钙通道阻滞剂联合血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在日本原发性高血压患者中的临床疗效。进行了一项为期16周的双盲,平行,随机临床试验,比较了控释硝苯地平(硝苯地平CR)加缬沙坦与氨氯地平加缬沙坦的联合治疗的疗效和安全性。主要终点是目标血压达到率。符合条件的患者被随机分配到硝苯地平基于CR或氨氯地平的治疗组中。每4周检查一次患者以确定血压是否已达到目标水平。当没有达到目标水平时,改变药物治疗方案;当达到目标血压时,继续使用相同的研究药物。研究共纳入505例患者(硝苯地平CR组:245例;氨氯地平组:260例)。治疗16周后,两组血压均显着降低,但硝苯地平CR组的血压降幅大于氨氯地平组(p <0.01)。硝苯地平CR组的目标血压达到率也显着更高(p <0.001)。两组之间药物相关不良事件的发生率无显着差异。这些结果表明,在患有原发性高血压的患者中,基于硝苯地平CR的联合疗法在降低血压和达到目标血压方面优于基于氨氯地平的疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号