首页> 外文期刊>Human brain mapping >Processing of false belief passages during natural story comprehension: An fMRI study
【24h】

Processing of false belief passages during natural story comprehension: An fMRI study

机译:自然故事理解过程中错误信念段落的处理:一项功能磁共振成像研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The neural correlates of theory of mind (ToM) are typically studied using paradigms which require participants to draw explicit, task-related inferences (e.g., in the false belief task). In a natural setup, such as listening to stories, false belief mentalizing occurs incidentally as part of narrative processing. In our experiment, participants listened to auditorily presented stories with false belief passages (implicit false belief processing) and immediately after each story answered comprehension questions (explicit false belief processing), while neural responses were measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). All stories included (among other situations) one false belief condition and one closely matched control condition. For the implicit ToM processing, we modeled the hemodynamic response during the false belief passages in the story and compared it to the hemodynamic response during the closely matched control passages. For implicit mentalizing, we found activation in typical ToM processing regions, that is the angular gyrus (AG), superior medial frontal gyrus (SmFG), precuneus (PCUN), middle temporal gyrus (MTG) as well as in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) billaterally. For explicit ToM, we only found AG activation. The conjunction analysis highlighted the left AG and MTG as well as the bilateral IFG as overlapping ToM processing regions for both implicit and explicit modes. Implicit ToM processing during listening to false belief passages, recruits the left SmFG and billateral PCUN in addition to the mentalizing network known form explicit processing tasks. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4231-4246, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:心智理论(ToM)的神经关联通常使用范式进行研究,范式要求参与者绘制与任务相关的明确推论(例如在错误信念任务中)。在诸如听故事的自然设置中,错误的信念心理化是作为叙事处理的一部分而偶然发生的。在我们的实验中,参与者听取了带有错误信念段落的故事(隐式错误信念处理),并在听完每个故事后回答了理解性问题(明确错误信念处理),而神经反应则通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行了测量。除其他情况外,所有故事都包括一个错误的信念条件和一个紧密匹配的控制条件。对于隐式ToM处理,我们对故事中错误信念通道期间的血液动力学响应进行了建模,并将其与紧密匹配的控制通道期间的血液动力学响应进行了比较。为了进行隐式思维,我们在典型的ToM处理区域(即角回(AG),上额额中回(SmFG),前突(PCUN),中颞回(MTG)以及下额回( IFG)。对于显式ToM,我们仅发现了AG激活。联合分析突出显示了左AG和MTG以及双边IFG作为隐式和显式模式的重叠ToM处理区域。在听取错误的信念段落期间进行隐式ToM处理,除了从显式处理任务中已知的心理化网络外,还招募左SmFG和双侧PCUN。嗡嗡声大脑Mapp 36:4231-4246,2015.(c)2015 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号