首页> 外文期刊>Herpetologica >PRIORITY USE OF CHEMICAL OVER VISUAL CUES FOR DETECTION OF PREDATORS BY GRAYBELLY SALAMANDERS, EURYCEA MULTIPLICATA GRISEOGASTER
【24h】

PRIORITY USE OF CHEMICAL OVER VISUAL CUES FOR DETECTION OF PREDATORS BY GRAYBELLY SALAMANDERS, EURYCEA MULTIPLICATA GRISEOGASTER

机译:优先使用化学方法而不是视觉方法检测灰背SA鱼(EURYCEA MULTIPLICATA GRISEOGASTER)捕食者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Many aquatic amphibians live in habitats with low visibility. In such habitats, chemical cues may be more reliable than visual cues for predator recognition. Adult perrenibranchiate graybelly salamanders, Eurycea multiplicata griseogaster, occupy clear-water streams with low levels of sedimentation and relatively few visual obstructions. In a previous laboratory experiment, graybelly salamanders distinguished between chemical stimuli from predatory fish (banded sculpins, Cottus carolinae) and nonpredatory tadpoles (Rana sphenocephala). In the present study, when only visual cues were available, salamanders did not distinguish between sculpins and tadpoles. Instead, they reduced activity in response to both predatory and nonpredatory heterospecifics in comparison to a blank control, indicating an alarm response to general disturbance rather than recognition of the specific predator, per se. To confirm that chemical stimuli are important under natural conditions, we tested whether graybelly salamanders in a natural stream habitat distinguished between chemical stimuli from sculpins, nonpredatory fish (stonerollers, Campostoma pullum), and a blank control. In contrast to their response to the nonpredator treatments, salamanders quickly moved away from the sculpin stimulus and then burrowed into the gravel substrate. Therefore, even for salamanders from clear-water habitats, chemical stimuli are more effective than visual stimuli for recognition of visually cryptic predators.
机译:许多水生两栖动物生活在能见度较低的栖息地。在这样的栖息地中,化学提示可能比视觉提示更可靠,从而有助于捕食者识别。成虫高毛ren灰腹gray(Eurycea multiplicata griseogaster)占据清水流,沉降水平低,视觉障碍相对较少。在先前的实验室实验中,灰腹sal蜥将掠食性鱼类的化学刺激(带状的cul鱼,Cottus carolinae)和非掠食性ad(Rana sphenocephala)区分开来。在本研究中,当只有视觉提示可用时,sal不会区分distinguish和and。取而代之的是,与空白对照相比,它们降低了对掠夺性和非掠夺性异特异反应的活动,表明对一般干扰的警报响应而不是对特定掠食者的识别。为了确认化学刺激物在自然条件下是否重要,我们测试了自然溪流栖息地的灰腹sal是否区分了来自sculpin,非掠食性鱼类(石stone鱼,Campostoma pullum)和空白对照的化学刺激物。与它们对非掠食性动物治疗的反应相反,am迅速脱离了尖刺刺激,然后钻入砾石基质。因此,即使对于来自清水栖息地的sal,化学刺激也比视觉刺激更有效地识别视觉上隐秘的食肉动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号