首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Community mental healthcare in England: associations between service organisation and quality of life.
【24h】

Community mental healthcare in England: associations between service organisation and quality of life.

机译:英格兰的社区精神卫生保健:服务组织与生活质量之间的联系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present authors set out to explore the relationship between different forms of service organisation and quality of life (QoL) for service users. Four mental health trusts and their corresponding social services departments were recruited to exemplify: (1). high and low levels of integration between health and social services; and (2). high and low levels of targeting at users with severe mental health problems. The authors used the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile, and chose their sample size to be able to detect a difference of 0.5 in subjective satisfaction scales. Analysis of covariance was used to investigate the simultaneous impact of variables representing user characteristics, objective and subjective QoL, and service organisation. Two hundred and sixty users selected at random from the active caseloads of mental health services in the four districts were interviewed at time 1 and 232 people were interviewed 6 months later (time 2). No bias was detected in the non-respondents at time 2. The authors found few differences between districts. As in other similar studies, QoL seemed to be stable for the whole sample over time. In 6 months, general satisfaction with leisure increased and the number of people who had been in hospital fell. Negative affect score was the only variable found to be associated with subjective QoL, and no predictors of objective QoL were identified. There was some evidence of better objective outcomes for people in receipt of integrated mental health services. They socialised more, and seemed to have less difficulty accessing police and legal services. The results also suggest that interventions targeted at negative affect could have benefits for subjective QoL.
机译:本作者着手探讨服务用户的不同形式的服务组织形式与生活质量(QoL)之间的关系。招募了四个精神卫生基金会及其相应的社会服务部门来举例说明:(1)。卫生和社会服务之间的高度融合和高度融合;和(2)。针对严重精神健康问题的使用者的高低目标。作者使用了《兰开夏郡生活质量档案》,并选择了他们的样本量,以便能够发现主观满意度量表的差异为0.5。协方差分析用于调查代表用户特征,客观和主观QoL以及服务组织的变量的同时影响。在时间1,从四个地区的活跃精神卫生服务工作量中随机选择的260名用户接受了采访,六个月后(时间2)接受了232人的采访。在第2时刻,未回答者中没有发现偏见。作者发现地区之间的差异很小。与其他类似研究一样,整个样品的QoL随时间推移也保持稳定。在6个月内,人们对休闲的总体满意度提高了,住院人数下降了。负面影响得分是唯一与主观QoL相关的变量,并且未发现客观QoL的预测因子。有证据表明,接受综合精神卫生服务的人们可以获得更好的客观结果。他们的社交活动更多,而获得警察和法律服务的困难似乎更少。结果还表明,针对负面影响的干预措施可能对主观生活质量有好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号